Locater ID proposal evaluation
draft-burness-locid-evaluate-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Anne-Louise Burness , Philip Eardley , Luigi Iannone | ||
| Last updated | 2008-07-14 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
There are many proposals for improving the Inter-domain routing system, most of which involve a form of locater-identity split. There needs to be a means to reason about the strengths of the different proposals against the design criteria, and without requiring large scale implementations. This document aims to start this process by drawing parallels with existing systems. It identifies a number of questions that need to be more fully thought about whilst we press ahead with system development.
Authors
Anne-Louise Burness
Philip Eardley
Luigi Iannone
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)