%% You should probably cite draft-campbell-dime-load-considerations-01 instead of this revision. @techreport{campbell-dime-load-considerations-00, number = {draft-campbell-dime-load-considerations-00}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-campbell-dime-load-considerations/00/}, author = {Ben Campbell}, title = {{Architectural Considerations for Diameter Load Information}}, pagetotal = 9, year = 2014, month = oct, day = 25, abstract = {RFC 7068 describes requirements for Overload Control in Diameter. This includes a requirement to allow Diameter nodes to send "load" information, even when the node is not overloaded. The Diameter Overload Information Conveyance (DOIC) solution describes a mechanism meeting most of the requirements, but does not currently include the ability to send load. This document explores some architectural considerations for a mechanism to send load information.}, }