Application Layer Gateway Problem Statement
draft-cao-alg-problem-statement-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Feng Cao , Bo Zhou | ||
| Last updated | 2010-07-05 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Application Layer Gateway (ALG) has been widely implemented and used to support address and port translation in the payload for some well- known protocols. Due to the lackness of standardization on addressing ALG related issues, a number of serious problems are faced by service deployments and upgrades. This document specifies the common problems for ALG in various aspects. In addition, some collected feedbacks are also listed as the next steps to tackle these problems.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)