Skip to main content

Quick and Dirty Security for GRASP
draft-carpenter-anima-quads-grasp-01

The information below is for an old version of the document.
Document Type
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Expired".
Author Brian E. Carpenter
Last updated 2019-10-23 (Latest revision 2019-10-15)
RFC stream (None)
Formats
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
draft-carpenter-anima-quads-grasp-01
Network Working Group                                       B. Carpenter
Internet-Draft                                         Univ. of Auckland
Intended status: Informational                          October 24, 2019
Expires: April 26, 2020

                   Quick and Dirty Security for GRASP
                  draft-carpenter-anima-quads-grasp-01

Abstract

   A secure substrate is required by the Generic Autonomic Signaling
   Protocol (GRASP) used by Autonomic Service Agents.  This document
   describes QUADS, a QUick And Dirty Security method using symmetric
   cryptography and preconfigured keys or passwords.  It also describes
   a simplistic QUADS Key Infrastructure based on asymmetric
   cryptography used over insecure instances of GRASP.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on April 26, 2020.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of

Carpenter                Expires April 26, 2020                 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft               QUADS for GRASP                October 2019

   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  QUick And Dirty Security Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   3.  QUick And Dirty Security Key Infrastructure . . . . . . . . .   3
   4.  Implementation Status [RFC Editor: please remove] . . . . . .   6
   5.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   6.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
   7.  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
   8.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     8.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     8.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
   Appendix A.  Change log [RFC Editor: Please remove] . . . . . . .   8
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8

1.  Introduction

   As defined in [I-D.ietf-anima-reference-model], the Autonomic Service
   Agent (ASA) is the atomic entity of an autonomic function, and it is
   instantiated on autonomic nodes.  When ASAs communicate with each
   other, they should use the Generic Autonomic Signaling Protocol
   (GRASP) [I-D.ietf-anima-grasp].  It is essential that such
   communication is strongly secured to avoid malicious interference
   with the Autonomic Network Infrastructure (ANI).

   For this reason, GRASP must run over a secure substrate that is
   isolated from regular data plane traffic.  This substrate is known as
   the Autonomic Control Plane (ACP).  A method for constructing an ACP
   at the network layer is described in
   [I-D.ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane].  Scenarios for link layer
   ACPs are discussed in [I-D.carpenter-anima-l2acp-scenarios].  The
   present document describes a simple method of emulating an ACP
   immediately above the transport layer, known as QUADS (QUick And
   Dirty Security) for GRASP.

   It also describes a simplistic key infrastructure known as QUADSKI,
   using asymmetric cryptography embedded in GRASP objectives used over
   insecure instances of GRASP.

2.  QUick And Dirty Security Method

   Every GRASP message, whether unicast or multicast, is encrypted
   immediately before transmission, and decrypted immediately after
   reception, using the same symmetric encryption algorithm and domain-
   wide shared keys.  This applies to all unicast and multicast messages

Carpenter                Expires April 26, 2020                 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft               QUADS for GRASP                October 2019

   sent over either UDP or TCP.  Typically encryption will take place
   immediately after a message is encoded as CBOR [RFC7049], and
   decryption will take place immediately before a message is decoded
   from CBOR.

   There is no attempt to specify an automatic algorithm choice or key
   distribution mechanism.  Every instance of GRASP in a given Autonomic
   Network (AN) must be pre-configured with the choice of encryption
   algorithm and any necessary parameters, and with the same key(s).

   An alternative to configuring the keys is that every instance of
   GRASP is pre-configured with a fixed salt value and the keys are
   created from a locally chosen keying password, using a pre-defined
   hash algorithm and that salt value.  Note that the salt value cannot
   be secret as it must be the same in all QUADS for all GRASP
   implementations.  In this model the secrecy depends on the keying
   password.

   The choice of algorithms should follow best current practice, e.g.
   [RFC8221].  At present the following choices are recommended: AES/
   CBC, key length 32, initialisation vector length 16, padding
   PKCS7(128).

3.  QUick And Dirty Security Key Infrastructure

   A QUADSKI key server exists in one instance in a given AN.  It
   supports two GRASP objectives, provisonally named "411:quadskip" and
   "411:quadski".  It runs via an instance of GRASP that is not running
   QUADS, i.e. its traffic is not encrypted except as defined below.

   "411:quadskip" is a synchronization objective that is flooded out to
   all nodes in the AN.  Its value is the PEM encoding of the public RSA
   key of the QUADSKI server.  In fragmentary CDDL [RFC8610], it is
   defined as follows:

  quadskip-objective = ["411:quadskip", objective-flags, loop-count, value]
  objective-flags = ; as in the GRASP specification
  loop-count = ; as in the GRASP specification
  value = server-PEM
  server-PEM = bytes

   The recommended frequency of flooding is once per minute with a valid
   life time of two minutes.  By this means, every autonomic node can
   learn the public key of the server.

   "411:quadski" is a negotiation objective that is used by an autonomic
   node that wishes to enrol securely in the AN, known as a "pledge" to

Carpenter                Expires April 26, 2020                 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft               QUADS for GRASP                October 2019

   align with BRSKI [I-D.ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra] terminology.
   In fragmentary CDDL, it is defined as follows:

  quadski-objective = ["411:quadski", objective-flags, loop-count, value]
  objective-flags = ; as in the GRASP specification
  loop-count = ; as in the GRASP specification
  value = pledge-value / server-value
  pledge-value = [encrypted-password, pledge-PEM]
  server-value = encrypted-keys
  encrypted-password = bytes
  pledge-PEM = bytes
  encrypted-keys = bytes

   The encrypted-password is a previously agreed domain password (which
   should not be the same as the keying password used in Section 2),
   RSA-encrypted using the public key of the server.

   The pledge-PEM is the PEM encoding of the public RSA key of the
   pledge node.

   The encrypted-keys value is the result of the following process:

   1.  Assume the symmetric cryptography in use is AES/CBC, key length
       32, initialisation vector length 16, padding PKCS7(128).

   2.  Let the key bytes be 'key' and the initialisation vector bytes be
       'iv'.

   3.  Construct the array object [key, iv].

   4.  Encode this object in CBOR.

   5.  Encrypt the resulting CBOR bytes with RSA using the public key of
       the pledge ("pledge-PEM").

   6.  The result is the value of "encrypted-keys".

   The QUADSKI server must have possession of the domain keys
   (Section 2) and the domain password when it starts up, by a method
   not specified here.  It then proceeds as follows:

   1.  Create an RSA key pair, store the private key, and prepare the
       PEM encoding of the public key ("server-PEM").

   2.  Start flooding out the "411:quadskip" objective with the "server-
       PEM" value, using the GRASP M_FLOOD message.

Carpenter                Expires April 26, 2020                 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft               QUADS for GRASP                October 2019

   3.  Start listening for negotiation requests (GRASP M_NEG_REQ) for
       the "411:quadski" objective.

   4.  Whenever it receives such a request, RSA-decrypt the "encrypted-
       password" using its private key.

   5.  If the password matches, recover the pledge's public key from the
       "pledge-PEM".

   6.  Generate the "encrypted-keys" value as described above, and reply
       (GRASP M_NEGOTIATE) with that value.

   7.  Normally, the pledge will reply with GRASP M_END and an O_ACCEPT
       option.

   Error conditions such as a password mismatch will be handled like any
   GRASP error condition, with GRASP M_END and an O_DECLINE option.

   The pledge proceeds as follows:

   1.  Create an RSA key pair, store the private key, and prepare the
       PEM encoding of the public key ("pledge-PEM").

   2.  Wait until it detects the flooded "411:quadskip" option, at which
       point it can recover the QUADSKI server's public key from the
       "server-PEM" value.

   3.  Request the domain password from the user.

   4.  RSA-encrypt the password using the server's public key.

   5.  Use GRASP discovery (M_DISCOVER "411:quadski") to locate the
       QUADSKI server.

   6.  Construct a "411:quadski" objective whose value is [encrypted-
       password, pledge-PEM] as described above.

   7.  Start the negotiation process (M_NEG_REQ).

   8.  When it receives a successful reply (M_NEGOTIATE), RSA-decrypt
       the value using its own private key, decode the result from CBOR,
       and thus recover the QUADS keys [key, iv].

   9.  Close the GRASP session with M_END + O_ACCEPT.

   As noted, this process uses unencrypted GRASP, since there are no
   QUADS keys available until it ends.  Unlike BRSKI
   [I-D.ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra], it does not rely on any

Carpenter                Expires April 26, 2020                 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft               QUADS for GRASP                October 2019

   limitation to link-local traffic, since it is protected by asymmetric
   cryptography.  However, for this to work on an evolving network where
   nodes may enrol at any time, GRASP must run encrypted for nodes that
   have acquired QUADS keys and simultaneously unencrypted for the
   QUADSKI process.  The simplest way to achieve this is to run two
   GRASP instances as necessary.  In particular, a node that acts as a
   GRASP relay needs to be able to relay encrypted traffic (for enrolled
   nodes) and unencrypted traffic (for nodes needing to run the QUADSKI
   process).  Note that such instances will receive GRASP broadcasts
   that they cannot interpret (encrypted packets reaching an unencrypted
   GRASP instance, and vice versa).  These packets can be harmlessly
   discarded.

4.  Implementation Status [RFC Editor: please remove]

   QUADS for GRASP has been implemented as a small extension to the
   Python GRASP prototype, using the Python 'cryptography' module.  The
   algorithm choices were:

   o  Encryption: AES/CBC, key lengths 32/16, padding PKCS7(128).

   o  Password hash: PBKDF2HMAC SHA256, length 32, 100000 iterations.

   o  Salt used for keying password hash:
      0xf474526a2e74accee189f1fbc1c34ceb.

   QUADSKI for GRASP has been implemented as two Python ASAs, known as
   'quadski.py' for the server and 'quadspledge.py' for the pledge node.
   These also use the Python 'cryptography' module.

   I probably need to specify some RSA parameters here...

   The code will be posted to https://github.com/becarpenter/graspy when
   stable.

5.  Security Considerations

   QUADS provides effective secrecy for all GRASP messages, against any
   party not in possession of the relevant shared keys.  However, before
   a GRASP message is encrypted or after it is decrypted, it is not
   protected within the host.  Therefore, secrecy is only effective
   against nodes that do not contain a GRASP instance in possession of
   the keys.  Those nodes cannot send valid GRASP messages, and they
   cannot interpret intercepted GRASP messages, including multicasts.
   However, they might attempt traffic analysis.

   QUADS provides authentication of GRASP instances to the extent that
   they must be in possession of the relevant shared keys.

Carpenter                Expires April 26, 2020                 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft               QUADS for GRASP                October 2019

   QUADS depends on pre-configuration of keys, or on password entry and
   a public salt value, for each autonomic node, unless QUADSKI is in
   use.

   QUADS offers no defence against denial of service attacks.

   QUADSKI securely avoids the need for pre-configuration of keys except
   in a central server.  Nevertheless it requires each joining node to
   be in possession of a domain password, and there is presently no
   rekeying procedure without rebooting the whole autonomic network.

6.  IANA Considerations

   This document makes no request of the IANA.

7.  Acknowledgements

   Excellent suggestions were made by TBD

8.  References

8.1.  Normative References

   [RFC8221]  Wouters, P., Migault, D., Mattsson, J., Nir, Y., and T.
              Kivinen, "Cryptographic Algorithm Implementation
              Requirements and Usage Guidance for Encapsulating Security
              Payload (ESP) and Authentication Header (AH)", RFC 8221,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC8221, October 2017,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8221>.

   [RFC8610]  Birkholz, H., Vigano, C., and C. Bormann, "Concise Data
              Definition Language (CDDL): A Notational Convention to
              Express Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) and
              JSON Data Structures", RFC 8610, DOI 10.17487/RFC8610,
              June 2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8610>.

8.2.  Informative References

   [I-D.carpenter-anima-l2acp-scenarios]
              Carpenter, B. and B. Liu, "Scenarios and Requirements for
              Layer 2 Autonomic Control Planes", draft-carpenter-anima-
              l2acp-scenarios-01 (work in progress), October 2019.

   [I-D.ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane]
              Eckert, T., Behringer, M., and S. Bjarnason, "An Autonomic
              Control Plane (ACP)", draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-
              plane-20 (work in progress), July 2019.

Carpenter                Expires April 26, 2020                 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft               QUADS for GRASP                October 2019

   [I-D.ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra]
              Pritikin, M., Richardson, M., Eckert, T., Behringer, M.,
              and K. Watsen, "Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key
              Infrastructures (BRSKI)", draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-
              keyinfra-28 (work in progress), September 2019.

   [I-D.ietf-anima-grasp]
              Bormann, C., Carpenter, B., and B. Liu, "A Generic
              Autonomic Signaling Protocol (GRASP)", draft-ietf-anima-
              grasp-15 (work in progress), July 2017.

   [I-D.ietf-anima-reference-model]
              Behringer, M., Carpenter, B., Eckert, T., Ciavaglia, L.,
              and J. Nobre, "A Reference Model for Autonomic
              Networking", draft-ietf-anima-reference-model-10 (work in
              progress), November 2018.

   [RFC7049]  Bormann, C. and P. Hoffman, "Concise Binary Object
              Representation (CBOR)", RFC 7049, DOI 10.17487/RFC7049,
              October 2013, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7049>.

Appendix A.  Change log [RFC Editor: Please remove]

   draft-carpenter-anima-quads-grasp-00, 2019-10-16:

   Initial version

   draft-carpenter-anima-quads-grasp-01, 2019-10-24:

   Added QUADSKI

Author's Address

   Brian Carpenter
   The University of Auckland
   School of Computer Science
   University of Auckland
   PB 92019
   Auckland  1142
   New Zealand

   Email: brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com

Carpenter                Expires April 26, 2020                 [Page 8]