BCP 101 Update for IPR Trust
draft-carpenter-bcp101-update-03

Brian has passed ptr to a reference to RFC-Editor:

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brc@zurich.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 10:02
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Cc: Lucy E. Lynch; Bert Wijnen
Subject: Re: Protocol Action: 'BCP101 Update for IPR Trust' to BCP


Hi,

The URL required to finalize reference [2] in this draft is
http://www.ietf.org/trust/IETFtrustAgreement20051208.pdf
which is intended to be a stable, permanent URL.

The date of the document is December 2005.

Thanks

    Brian

The IESG wrote:
> The IESG has approved the following document:
>
> - 'BCP101 Update for IPR Trust '
>    as a BCP
>
> This document has been reviewed in the IETF but is not the product of an
> IETF Working Group.
>
> The IESG contact person is Bert Wijnen.
>
> A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-carpenter-bcp101-update-03.txt
>
> Technical Summary
>
>  This document updates BCP 101 to take account of the new IETF
>  Intellectual Property Trust.
>
> Working Group Summary
>
>  This is not a WG document. It was created by members of the IAOC
>  and reviewed by the IAOC and our legal counsel Jorge Contreras
>  participated in that review.
>
>  The document has further undergone the normal 4-week IETF
>  Last Call for review by the IETF community.
>
> Protocol Quality
>
>  The document has been reviewed for the IESG by Bert Wijnen
>
>

Two revisions were made after IETF Last Call:

- revision 02 to address some IETF Last Call comments and AD review
- revision 03 to address a discuss by Ted Hardie

Revision 3 has been approved.

Bert

[Ballot discuss]
Since the addition of this text:

This update comes into force as soon as it has been approved by the
  IESG and the IETF Trust Agreement has been formally signed by its
  Settlors and initial Trustees.

does the document require a normative reference to the Trust Agreement?