Alternative Proposed Model for RFC Editing and Publication
draft-carpenter-rfced-model-00

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Author Brian Carpenter 
Last updated 2021-02-21 (latest revision 2020-08-20)
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
pdf htmlized (tools) htmlized bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-carpenter-rfced-model-00.txt

Abstract

The finishing process for a document that is approved for publication as an RFC currently involves a somewhat detailed and lengthy process. The system that executes that process involves a number of different actors, each bringing competency with different aspects of the overall process. Ensuring that this process functions smoothly is critical to the mission of the organizations that publish documents in the RFC series. This document proposes a framework for that system that aims to provide clear delineations of accountability and responsibility for each of the actors in this system. It would require significant updates to RFC 8728 and RFC 8729, and minor updates to RFC 2850 and RFC 7841. Discussion of this document takes place on the RFC Editor Futures mailing list (rfced-future@iab.org).

Authors

Brian Carpenter (brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)