Best Practices for HTTP-CoAP Mapping Implementation
draft-castellani-core-http-mapping-07
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Angelo P. Castellani , Salvatore Loreto , Akbar Rahman , Thomas Fossati , Esko Dijk | ||
| Last updated | 2013-08-29 (Latest revision 2013-02-25) | ||
| Replaced by | RFC 8075 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-core-http-mapping | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This draft provides reference information for HTTP-CoAP protocol translation proxy implementors, focusing primarily on the reverse proxy case. It details deployment options, discusses possible approaches for URI mapping, and provides a set of guidelines and considerations related to protocol translation.
Authors
Angelo P. Castellani
Salvatore Loreto
Akbar Rahman
Thomas Fossati
Esko Dijk
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)