PCEP Extensions for RSVP-TE Local-Protection with PCE-Stateful
draft-cbrt-pce-stateful-local-protection-01
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Colby Barth , Raveendra Torvi | ||
| Last updated | 2018-12-31 (Latest revision 2018-06-29) | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
plain text
xml
htmlized
pdfized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of
the expired Internet-Draft can be found at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-cbrt-pce-stateful-local-protection-01.txt
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-cbrt-pce-stateful-local-protection-01.txt
Abstract
Stateful PCE [RFC8231] can apply global concurrent optimizations to optimize LSP placement. In a deployment where a PCE is used to compute all the paths, it may be beneficial for the local protection paths to also be computed by the PCE. This document defines extensions needed for the setup and management of RSVP-TE protection paths by the PCE.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)