%% You should probably cite draft-cel-nfsv4-hash-tree-interchange-format-03 instead of this revision.
@techreport{cel-nfsv4-hash-tree-interchange-format-01,
    number =    {draft-cel-nfsv4-hash-tree-interchange-format-01},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cel-nfsv4-hash-tree-interchange-format/01/},
    author =    {Chuck Lever},
    title =     {{Attestation of File Content using an X.509 Certificate}},
    pagetotal = 13,
    year =      2021,
    month =     may,
    day =       28,
    abstract =  {This document describes a compact open format for transporting and storing an abbreviated form of a cryptographically signed hash tree. Receivers use this representation to reconstitute the hash tree and verify the integrity of file content protected by that tree. An X.509 certificate encapsulates and protects the hash tree metadata and provides cryptographic provenance. Therefore this document updates the Internet X.509 certificate profile specified in RFC 5280.},
}