6TiSCH Minimal Scheduling Function (MSF)
draft-chang-6tisch-msf-00
The information below is for an old version of the document.
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Expired".
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Tengfei Chang , Mališa Vučinić , Xavier Vilajosana | ||
| Last updated | 2017-11-01 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-chang-6tisch-msf-00
6TiSCH T. Chang, Ed.
Internet-Draft Inria
Intended status: Standards Track M. Vucinic
Expires: May 3, 2018 University of Montenegro
X. Vilajosana
Universitat Oberta de Catalunya
October 30, 2017
6TiSCH Minimal Scheduling Function (MSF)
draft-chang-6tisch-msf-00
Abstract
This specification defines the 6TiSCH Minimal Scheduling Function
(MSF). This Scheduling Function describes both the behavior of a
node when joining the network, and how the communication schedule is
managed in a distributed fashion. MSF builds upon the 6top Protocol
(6P) and the Minimal Security Framework for 6TiSCH.
Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
[RFC2119].
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on May 3, 2018.
Chang, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft 6TiSCH Minimal Scheduling Function (MSF) October 2017
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Interface to the Minimal 6TiSCH Configuration . . . . . . . . 4
3. Node Behavior at Boot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.1. Start State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.2. Step 1 - Choosing Frequency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.3. Step 2 - Receiving EBs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.4. Step 3 - Join Request/Response . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.5. Step 4 - Acquiring a RPL rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.6. Step 5 - 6P ADD to Preferred Parent . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.7. Step 6 - Send EBs and DIOs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.8. Step 7 - Neighbor Polling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.9. End State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4. Rules for Adding/Deleting Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.1. Adapting to Traffic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
4.2. Switching Parent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4.3. Handling Schedule Collisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
5. 6P SIGNAL command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
6. Scheduling Function Identifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
7. Rules for CellList . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
8. 6P Timeout Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
9. Rule for Ordering Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
10. Meaning of the Metadata Field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
11. 6P Error Handling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
12. Schedule Inconsistency Handling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
13. MSF Constants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
14. MSF Statistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
15. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
16. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
16.1. MSF Scheduling Function Identifiers . . . . . . . . . . 14
17. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
17.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Chang, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft 6TiSCH Minimal Scheduling Function (MSF) October 2017
17.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Appendix A. Implementation Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Appendix B. Performance Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Appendix C. [TEMPORARY] Changelog . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
1. Introduction
The 6TiSCH Minimal Scheduling Function (MSF), defined in this
specification, is a 6TiSCH Scheduling Function (SF). The role of an
SF is entirely defined in [I-D.ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol]: it
complements [I-D.ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol] by providing the rules of
when to add/delete cells in the communication schedule. The SF
defined in this document follows that definition, and satisfies all
the requirements for an SF listed in Section 4.2 of
[I-D.ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol].
MSF builds on top of the following specifications: the Minimal IPv6
over the TSCH Mode of IEEE 802.15.4e (6TiSCH) Configuration
[RFC8180], the 6top Protocol (6P) [I-D.ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol],
and the Minimal Security Framework for 6TiSCH
[I-D.ietf-6tisch-minimal-security].
MSF defines both the behavior of a node when joining the network, and
how the communication schedule is managed in a distributed fashion.
When a node running MSF boots up, it joins the network by following
the 7 steps described in Section 3. The end state of the join
process is that the node is synchronized to the network, has mutually
authenticated to the network, has identified a preferred routing
parent, and has scheduled a single dedicated cell to that parent.
After the join process, the node can continuously add/delete/relocate
cells, as described in Section 4. It does so for 3 reasons: to match
the link-layer resources to the traffic, to handle changing parent,
to handle a schedule collision.
MSF is designed to operate in a wide range of application domains.
It is optimized for applications with regular upstream traffic (from
the nodes to the Internet). Appendix B contains a performance
evaluation of MSF.
This specification follows the recommended structure of an SF
specification in Appendix A of [I-D.ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol], with
the following adaptations:
o We have reordered part of the sections, in particular to have the
section on the node behavior at boot Section 3 appear early in
this specification.
Chang, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft 6TiSCH Minimal Scheduling Function (MSF) October 2017
o We added sections on the interface to the minimal 6TiSCH
configuration Section 2, the use of the SIGNAL command Section 5,
the MSF constants Section 13, the MSF statistics Section 14, the
performance of MSF Appendix B.
o We have not included an examples section.
2. Interface to the Minimal 6TiSCH Configuration
A node implementing MSF MUST implement the Minimal 6TiSCH
Configuration [RFC8180], which defines the "minimal cell", a single
shared cell providing minimal connectivity between the nodes in the
network.
MSF uses the minimal cell to exchange the following packets:
1. Enhanced Beacons (EBs), defined by [IEEE802154-2015]. These are
broadcast frames.
2. DODAG Information Objects (DIOs), defined by [RFC6550]. These
are broadcast frames.
3. The Join Request and Join Response packets when sent between the
pledge and the Join Proxy, defined by
[I-D.ietf-6tisch-minimal-security]. These are unicast frames.
4. The first 6P packet a node issues to a neighbor it doesn't have
dedicated cells to, as defined by
[I-D.ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol]. These are unicast frames.
Because the minimal cell is SHARED, the back-off algorithm defined in
[IEEE802154-2015] is used to resolve collisions. To ensure there is
enough bandwidth available on the minimal cell for the unicast
traffic, a node implementing MSF SHOULD enforce the following rules
for broadcast frames:
1. send EBs on a portion of the minimal cells not exceeding
1/(3(N+1)), where N is the number of neighbors of the node.
2. send DIOs on a portion of the minimal cells not exceeding
1/(3(N+1)), where N is the number of neighbors of the node.
The RECOMMENDED behavior for sending EBs is to have a node send EBs
with a probability of 1/(3(N+1)). The RECOMMENDED behavior for
sending DIOs is to use a Trickle timer with rate-limiting.
Section 3.3 describes how to evaluate the number of neighbors during
the joining process. After the joining process, how to evaluate the
number of neighbors is implementation-specific.
As detailed in Section 2.2 of [I-D.ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol], MSF
MUST schedule cells from Slotframe 1, while Slotframe 0 is used for
traffic defined in the Minimal 6TiSCH Configuration. The length of
Chang, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft 6TiSCH Minimal Scheduling Function (MSF) October 2017
Slotframe 0 and Slotframe 1 MUST be the same value. The default of
SLOTFRAME_LENGTH is RECOMMENDED, although any value can be advertised
in the EBs.
3. Node Behavior at Boot
This section details the behavior the node SHOULD follow from the
moment it is switched on, until it has successfully joined the
network. Section 3.1 details the start state; Section 3.9 details
the end state. The other sections detail the 7 steps of the joining
process. We use the term "pledge" and "joined node", as defined in
[I-D.ietf-6tisch-minimal-security].
3.1. Start State
A node implementing MSF MUST implement the Minimal Security Framework
for 6TiSCH [I-D.ietf-6tisch-minimal-security]. As a corollary, this
means that a pledge, before being switched on, is pre-configured with
the Pre-Shared Key (PSK) for joining, as well as any other
configuration detailed in [I-D.ietf-6tisch-minimal-security].
3.2. Step 1 - Choosing Frequency
When switched on, the pledge SHOULD randomly choose a frequency among
the available frequencies, and start listening for EBs on that
frequency.
3.3. Step 2 - Receiving EBs
Upon receiving the first EB, the pledge SHOULD continue listening for
additional EBs to learn:
1. the number of neighbors N in its vicinity
2. which neighbor to choose as a Join Proxy (JP) for the joining
process
While the exact behavior is implementation-specific, the RECOMMENDED
behavior is to follow [RFC8180], and listen until EBs sent by
NUM_NEIGHBOURS_TO_WAIT (defined in [RFC8180]) have been received.
During this step, the pledge MAY synchronize to any EB it receives
from the network it wishes to join. How to decide whether an EB
originates from a node from the network it wishes to join is
implementation-specific, but MAY involve filtering EBs by the PAN ID
field it contains, the presence and contents of the IE defined in
[I-D.richardson-6tisch-join-enhanced-beacon], or the key used to
authenticate it.
Chang, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft 6TiSCH Minimal Scheduling Function (MSF) October 2017
The decision of which neighbor to use as a JP is implementation-
specific, and discussed in [I-D.ietf-6tisch-minimal-security].
3.4. Step 3 - Join Request/Response
As per [I-D.ietf-6tisch-minimal-security], after having selected a
JP, the pledge sends a Join Request to its JP. Because no dedicated
cells are in place at this point, this happens on the minimal cell.
The JP then forwards the Join Request to the JRC, possibly over
multiple hops. When forwarding this Join Request, a node MUST use a
dedicated cell it has with its preferred parent (not the minimal
cell). How such dedicated cells are installed is detailed in
Section 3.6.
As per [I-D.ietf-6tisch-minimal-security], the JRC sends back a Join
Response to the pledge, through the JP. When forwarding this Join
Response, a node MUST use a dedicated cell it has with its child (not
the minimal cell). How such dedicated cells are installed is
detailed in Section 3.6.
As per [I-D.ietf-6tisch-minimal-security], after receiving the Join
Response, the pledge learns the keying material used in the network,
as well as other configurations, and becomes a "joined node".
3.5. Step 4 - Acquiring a RPL rank
Because it has learned the link-layer keying material used in the
network, the joined node can now decrypt the DIO packets sent by its
neighbors. Per [RFC6550], the joined node receives DIOs, computes
its own rank, and selects a preferred parent.
3.6. Step 5 - 6P ADD to Preferred Parent
After having selected a preferred parent, the joined node MUST issue
a 6P ADD command to that parent, with the following fields:
o CellOptions: set to TX=1,RX=1,SHARED=1
o NumCells: set to 1
o CellList: at least 5 cells, chosen according to Section 7
After the 6P Transaction is finished, the node MUST synchronize only
to its preferred parent. At this point, the node has a dedicated
cell which allows for bidirectional communication with its preferred
parent.
Chang, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft 6TiSCH Minimal Scheduling Function (MSF) October 2017
3.7. Step 6 - Send EBs and DIOs
The node SHOULD start sending EBs and DIOs on the minimal cell, while
following the transmit rules for broadcast frames from Section 2.
3.8. Step 7 - Neighbor Polling
The node SHOULD send some form of keep-alive messages to all its
neighbors it has dedicated cells with. The Keep-Alive (KA) mechanism
is detailed in [RFC7554]. It uses the keep-alive messages to its
preferred parent to stay synchronized. It uses the keep-alive
messages to its children (with which it has a dedicated cell to,
which the child has created) to ensure the child is still reachable.
The RECOMMENDED period for sending keep-alive messages is KA_PERIOD.
If the keep-alive message to a child fails at the link layer (i.e.
the maximum number of link-layer retries is reached), the node SHOULD
declare the child as unreachable. This can happen for example when
the child node is switched off.
When a neighbor is declared unreachable, the node MUST issue a 6P
CLEAR to that neighbor (which can fail at the link-layer), and MUST
remove all dedicated links with that neighbor from its own schedule.
3.9. End State
For a new node, the end state of the joining process is:
o it is synchronized to the network
o it is using the link-layer keying material it learned through the
secure joining process
o it has identified its preferred routing parent
o it has a single dedicated cell to its preferred routing parent
o it is periodically sending DIOs, potentially serving as a router
for other nodes' traffic
o it is periodically sending EBs, potentially serving as a JP for
new joining nodes
4. Rules for Adding/Deleting Cells
Once a node has joined the 6TiSCH network, it adds/deletes/relocates
cells with its preferred parent for three reasons:
o to match the link-layer resources to the traffic between the node
and its preferred parent (Section 4.1)
o to handle switching preferred parent (Section 4.2)
o to handle a schedule collision (Section 4.3)
Chang, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft 6TiSCH Minimal Scheduling Function (MSF) October 2017
4.1. Adapting to Traffic
A node implementing MSF MUST implement the behavior described in this
section.
The goal of MSF is to manage the communication schedule in the 6TiSCH
schedule in a distributed manner. For a node, this translates into
monitoring the current usage of the cells it has to its preferred
parent:
o If the node determines that the number of link-layer frames it is
attempting to exchange with its preferred parent per unit of time
is larger than the capacity offered by the TSCH cells it has
scheduled with it, it triggers a 6P Transaction with its preferred
parent to add cells to the TSCH schedule of both nodes.
o If the traffic is lower than the capacity, the node triggers a 6P
Transaction with its preferred parent to delete cells from the
TSCH schedule of both nodes.
From the join process, the node already has one dedicated cell
scheduled to its preferred parent. A node MUST NOT remove all cells
to its preferred parent, i.e. there must always be at least one
dedicated cell scheduled between a node and its preferred parent,
even if no frames are being exchanged between them.
Adding/removing/relocating cells involves exchanging frames that
contain 6P commands. Once the first cell has been established as
part of the join process, all 6P frames MUST be sent on the dedicated
cells (not the minimal cell).
The node MUST maintain the following counters for its preferred
parent:
NumCellsPassed: Counts the number of dedicated cells that have
passed since the counter was initialized. This counter is
initialized at 0. Each time the TSCH state machine indicates the
current cell is a dedicated cell to the preferred parent,
NumCellsPassed is incremented by exactly 1.
NumCellsUsed: Counts the number of dedicated cells that have been
used. This counter is initialized at 0. NumCellsUsed is
incremented by exactly 1 when, during a dedicated cell to the
preferred parent, either of the following happens:
* The node sends a frame to its preferred parent. The counter
increments regardless of whether a link-layer acknowledgment
was received or not.
* The node receives a frame from its preferred parent.
Chang, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft 6TiSCH Minimal Scheduling Function (MSF) October 2017
Implementors MAY choose to create the same counters for each
neighbor, and add them as additional statistics in the neighbor
table.
The counters are used as follows:
1. Both NumCellsPassed and NumCellsUsed are initialized to 0 when
the node boots.
2. When the value of NumCellsPassed reaches MAX_NUMCELLS:
* If NumCellsUsed > LIM_NUMCELLSUSED_HIGH, trigger 6P to add a
single cell to the preferred parent
* If NumCellsUsed < LIM_NUMCELLSUSED_LOW, trigger 6P to remove a
single cell to the preferred parent
* Reset both NumCellsPassed and NumCellsUsed to 0 and go to step
2.
4.2. Switching Parent
A node implementing MSF MUST implement the behavior described in this
section.
Part of its normal operation, the RPL routing protocol can have a
node switch preferred parents. The procedure for switching from the
old preferred parent to the new preferred parent is:
1. the node counts the number of dedicated cells it has per
slotframe to the old preferred parent
2. the node triggers one or more 6P ADD commands to schedule the
same number of dedicated cells to the new preferred parent
3. when that successfully completes, the node issues a 6P CLEAR
command to its old preferred parent
4.3. Handling Schedule Collisions
A node implementing MSF SHOULD implement the behavior described in
this section. The "MUST" statements in this section hence only apply
if the node implements schedule collision handling.
Since scheduling is entirely distributed, there is a non-zero
probability that two pairs of nearby neighbor nodes schedule a cell
at the same [slotOffset,channelOffset] location in the TSCH schedule.
In that case, data exchanged by the two pairs may collide on that
cell. We call this case a "schedule collision".
The node MUST maintain the following counters for each cell to its
preferred parent:
Chang, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft 6TiSCH Minimal Scheduling Function (MSF) October 2017
NumTx: Counts the number of transmission attempts on that cell.
Each time the node attempts to transmit a frame on that cell,
NumTx is incremented by exactly 1.
NumTxAck: Counts the number of successful transmission attempts on
that cell. Each time the node receives an acknowledgment for a
transmission attempt, NumTxAck is incremented by exactly 1.
Implementors MAY choose to maintain the same counters for each cell
in the schedule.
Since both NumTx and NumTxAck are initialized to 0, we necessarily
have NumTxAck <= NumTx. We call Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR) the
ratio NumTxAck/NumTx; and represent it as a percentage. A cell with
PDR=50% means that half of the frames transmitted are not
acknowledged (and need to be retransmitted).
Each time the node switches preferred parent (or during the join
process when the node selects a preferred parent for the first time),
both NumTx and NumTxAck MUST be reset to 0. They increment over
time, as the schedule is executed and the node sends frames to its
preferred parent. When NumTx reaches 256, both NumTx and NumTxAck
MUST be divided by 2. That is, for example, from NumTx=256 and
NumTxAck=128, they become NumTx=128 and NumTxAck=64. This operation
does not change the value of the PDR, but allows the counters to keep
incrementing.
The key for detecting a schedule collision is that, if a node has
several cells to the same preferred parent, all cells should exhibit
the same PDR. A cell which exhibits a PDR significantly worse than
the others indicates than there are collisions on that cell.
Every HOUSEKEEPINGCOLLISION_PERIOD, the node executes the following
steps:
1. It aborts this series of steps if NumTx hasn't been divided by 2
since it was last reset. This avoids triggering cell relocation
when the values of NumTx and NumTxAck are not statistically
significant yet.
2. It computes, for each cell with its preferred parent, that cell's
PDR.
3. It identifies the cell with the highest PDR.
4. For each other cell, it compare its PDR against that of the cell
with the highest PDR. If it's less than RELOCATE_PDRTHRES, it
triggers the relocation of that cell using a 6P RELOCATE command.
Chang, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft 6TiSCH Minimal Scheduling Function (MSF) October 2017
5. 6P SIGNAL command
The 6P SIGNAL command is not used by MSF.
6. Scheduling Function Identifier
The Scheduling Function Identifier (SFID) of MSF is
IANA_6TISCH_SFID_MSF.
7. Rules for CellList
MSF uses 2-step 6P Transactions exclusively. 6P Transactions are
only initiated by a node towards it preferred parent. As a result,
the cells to put in the CellList of a 6P ADD command, and in the
candidate CellList of a RELOCATE command, are chosen by the node. In
both cases, the same rules apply:
the CellList SHOULD contain 5 or more cells.
Each cell in the CellList MUST have a different slotOffset value.
For each cell in the CellList, the node MUST NOT have any
scheduled cell on the same slotOffset.
The slotOffset value of any cell in the CellList MUST NOT be the
same as the slotOffset of the minimal cell (slotOffset=0).
The slotOffset of a cell in the CellList SHOULD be randomly and
uniformly chosen among all the slotOffset values that satisfy the
restriction above.
The channelOffset of a cell in the CellList SHOULD be randomly and
uniformly in [0..numFrequencies] where numFrequencies represents
the number of frequencies a node can communicate on.
8. 6P Timeout Value
The 6P Timeout is not a constant value. It is calculated a (C/
PDR)*6PTIMEOUT_SEC_FACTOR, where:
o C represents the number of cells per second scheduled to that
neighbor
o PDR represents the average PDR of those cells
o 6PTIMEOUT_SEC_FACTOR is a security factor, a constant
9. Rule for Ordering Cells
Cells are ordered slotOffset first, channelOffset second.
The following sequence is correctly ordered (each element represents
the [slottOffset,channelOffset] of a cell in the schedule):
[1,3],[1,4],[2,0],[5,3],[6,0],[6,3],[7,9]
Chang, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft 6TiSCH Minimal Scheduling Function (MSF) October 2017
10. Meaning of the Metadata Field
The Metadata field is not used by MSF.
11. 6P Error Handling
Section 6.2.4 of [I-D.ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol] lists the 6P Return
Codes. Figure 1 lists the same error codes, and the behavior a node
implementing MSF SHOULD follow.
+-------------+----------------------+
| Code | RECOMMENDED behavior |
+-------------+----------------------+
| RC_SUCCESS | nothing |
| RC_EOL | nothing |
| RC_ERROR | quarantine |
| RC_RESET | quarantine |
| RC_VERSION | quarantine |
| RC_SFID | quarantine |
| RC_SEQNUM | clear |
| RC_CELLLIST | clear |
| RC_BUSY | waitretry |
| RC_LOCKED | waitretry |
+-------------+----------------------+
Figure 1: Recommended behavior for each 6P Error Code.
The meaning of each behavior from Figure 1 is:
nothing: Indicates that this Return Code is not an error. No error
handling behavior is hence triggered.
clear: Abort the 6P Transaction. Issue a 6P CLEAR command to that
neighbor (this command may fail). Remove all cells scheduled
with that neighbor from the local schedule. Keep that node in
the neighbor and routing tables.
quarantine: Same behavior as for "clear". In addition, remove the
node from the neighbor and routing tables. Place the node's
identifier in a quarantine list for QUARANTINE_DURATION. When in
quarantine, drop all frames received from that node.
waitretry: Abort the 6P Transaction. Wait for a duration randomly
and uniformly chosen in [WAITDURATION_MIN,WAITDURATION_MAX].
Retry the same transaction.
12. Schedule Inconsistency Handling
The behavior when schedule inconsistency is detected is explained in
Figure 1, for 6P Return Code RC_SEQNUM.
Chang, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft 6TiSCH Minimal Scheduling Function (MSF) October 2017
13. MSF Constants
Figure 2 lists MSF Constants and their RECOMMENDED values.
+------------------------------+-------------------+
| Name | RECOMMENDED value |
+------------------------------+-------------------+
| KA_PERIOD | 10 s |
| LIM_NUMCELLSUSED_HIGH | 75 % |
| LIM_NUMCELLSUSED_LOW | 25 % |
| HOUSEKEEPINGCOLLISION_PERIOD | 1 min |
| RELOCATE_PDRTHRES | 50 % |
| 6PTIMEOUT_SEC_FACTOR | 3 x |
| SLOTFRAME_LENGTH | 101 slots |
| QUARANTINE_DURATION | 5 min |
| WAITDURATION_MIN | 30 s |
| WAITDURATION_MAX | 60 s |
+------------------------------+-------------------+
Figure 2: MSF Constants and their RECOMMENDED values.
14. MSF Statistics
Figure 3 lists MSF Statistics and their RECOMMENDED width.
+-----------------+-------------------+
| Name | RECOMMENDED width |
+-----------------+-------------------+
| NumCellsPassed | 1 byte |
| NumCellsUsed | 1 byte |
| NumTx | 1 byte |
| NumTxAck | 1 byte |
+-----------------+-------------------+
Figure 3: MSF Statistics and their RECOMMENDED width.
15. Security Considerations
MSF defines a series of "rules" for the node to follow. It triggers
several actions, that are carried out by the protocols defined in the
following specifications: the Minimal IPv6 over the TSCH Mode of IEEE
802.15.4e (6TiSCH) Configuration [RFC8180], the 6top Protocol (6P)
[I-D.ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol], and the Minimal Security Framework
for 6TiSCH [I-D.ietf-6tisch-minimal-security]. In particular, MSF
does not define a new protocol or packet format.
MSF relies entirely on the security mechanisms defined in the
specifications listed above.
Chang, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft 6TiSCH Minimal Scheduling Function (MSF) October 2017
16. IANA Considerations
16.1. MSF Scheduling Function Identifiers
This document adds the following number to the "6P Scheduling
Function Identifiers" sub-registry, part of the "IPv6 over the TSCH
mode of IEEE 802.15.4e (6TiSCH) parameters" registry, as defined by
[I-D.ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol]:
+----------------------+-----------------------------+-------------+
| SFID | Name | Reference |
+----------------------+-----------------------------+-------------+
| IANA_6TISCH_SFID_MSF | Minimal Scheduling Function | RFCXXXX |
| | (MSF) | (NOTE:this) |
+----------------------+-----------------------------+-------------+
Figure 4: IETF IE Subtype '6P'.
17. References
17.1. Normative References
[I-D.ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol]
Wang, Q., Vilajosana, X., and T. Watteyne, "6top Protocol
(6P)", draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-09 (work in
progress), October 2017.
[I-D.ietf-6tisch-minimal-security]
Vucinic, M., Simon, J., Pister, K., and M. Richardson,
"Minimal Security Framework for 6TiSCH", draft-ietf-
6tisch-minimal-security-04 (work in progress), October
2017.
[I-D.richardson-6tisch-join-enhanced-beacon]
Dujovne, D. and M. Richardson, "IEEE802.15.4 Informational
Element encapsulation of 6tisch Join Information", draft-
richardson-6tisch-join-enhanced-beacon-02 (work in
progress), July 2017.
[IEEE802154-2015]
IEEE standard for Information Technology, "IEEE Std
802.15.4-2015 Standard for Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area
Networks (WPANs)", December 2015.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
Chang, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft 6TiSCH Minimal Scheduling Function (MSF) October 2017
[RFC6550] Winter, T., Ed., Thubert, P., Ed., Brandt, A., Hui, J.,
Kelsey, R., Levis, P., Pister, K., Struik, R., Vasseur,
JP., and R. Alexander, "RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for
Low-Power and Lossy Networks", RFC 6550,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6550, March 2012,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6550>.
[RFC7554] Watteyne, T., Ed., Palattella, M., and L. Grieco, "Using
IEEE 802.15.4e Time-Slotted Channel Hopping (TSCH) in the
Internet of Things (IoT): Problem Statement", RFC 7554,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7554, May 2015,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7554>.
[RFC8180] Vilajosana, X., Ed., Pister, K., and T. Watteyne, "Minimal
IPv6 over the TSCH Mode of IEEE 802.15.4e (6TiSCH)
Configuration", BCP 210, RFC 8180, DOI 10.17487/RFC8180,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8180>.
17.2. Informative References
[OpenWSN] Watteyne, T., Vilajosana, X., Kerkez, B., Chraim, F.,
Weekly, K., Wang, Q., Glaser, S., and K. Pister, "OpenWSN:
a Standards-Based Low-Power Wireless Development
Environment", Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications
Technologies , August 2012.
[RFC6982] Sheffer, Y. and A. Farrel, "Improving Awareness of Running
Code: The Implementation Status Section", RFC 6982,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6982, July 2013,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6982>.
Appendix A. Implementation Status
This section records the status of known implementations of the
protocol defined by this specification at the time of posting of this
Internet-Draft, and is based on a proposal described in [RFC6982].
The description of implementations in this section is intended to
assist the IETF in its decision processes in progressing drafts to
RFCs. Please note that the listing of any individual implementation
here does not imply endorsement by the IETF. Furthermore, no effort
has been spent to verify the information presented here that was
supplied by IETF contributors. This is not intended as, and must not
be construed to be, a catalog of available implementations or their
features. Readers are advised to note that other implementations may
exist.
According to [RFC6982], "this will allow reviewers and working groups
to assign due consideration to documents that have the benefit of
Chang, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft 6TiSCH Minimal Scheduling Function (MSF) October 2017
running code, which may serve as evidence of valuable experimentation
and feedback that have made the implemented protocols more mature.
It is up to the individual working groups to use this information as
they see fit".
OpenWSN: MSF is being implemented in the OpenWSN project [OpenWSN]
under a BSD open-source license. The authors of this document are
collaborating with the OpenWSN community to gather feedback about
the status and performance of the protocols described in this
document. Results from that discussion will appear in this
section in future revision of this specification. More
information about this implementation at http://www.openwsn.org/.
6TiSCH simulator The 6TiSCH simulator is a Python-based high-level
simulator on which MSF is being implemented. More information at
https://bitbucket.org/6tisch/simulator/.
Appendix B. Performance Evaluation
The performance of MSF may be published as companion documents to
this specification, possibly under the form a applicability
statements.
Appendix C. [TEMPORARY] Changelog
o draft-chang-6tisch-msf-00
* Initial submission.
Authors' Addresses
Tengfei Chang (editor)
Inria
2 rue Simone Iff
Paris 75012
France
Email: tengfei.chang@inria.fr
Malisa Vucinic
University of Montenegro
Dzordza Vasingtona bb
Podgorica 81000
Montenegro
Email: malisav@ac.me
Chang, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft 6TiSCH Minimal Scheduling Function (MSF) October 2017
Xavier Vilajosana
Universitat Oberta de Catalunya
156 Rambla Poblenou
Barcelona, Catalonia 08018
Spain
Email: xvilajosana@uoc.edu
Chang, et al. Expires May 3, 2018 [Page 17]