Deterministic Route Redistribution into BGP
draft-chen-bgp-redist-03
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(idr WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Enke Chen , Jenny Yuan | ||
| Last updated | 2022-02-13 (Latest revision 2021-08-12) | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | Candidate for WG Adoption | |
| Document shepherd | Susan Hares | ||
| Shepherd write-up | Show Last changed 2021-12-09 | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | shares@ndzh.com |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
In this document we present several examples of non-deterministic routing behavior involving route redistribution into BGP. In order to eliminate such non-deterministic behavior, we propose an enhancement to BGP route selection that would take into account the administrative distance under certain conditions. We also recommend that the LOCAL_PREF value be reduced for the redistributed backup route, and be calculated automatically based on the administrative distance.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)