BIER-TE for Broadcast Link
draft-chen-bier-te-lan-09
| Document | Type | Active Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Huaimo Chen , Mike McBride , Aijun Wang , Gyan Mishra , Lei Liu , Xufeng Liu | ||
| Last updated | 2024-03-28 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-chen-bier-te-lan-09
Network Working Group H. Chen
Internet-Draft M. McBride
Intended status: Standards Track Futurewei
Expires: 29 September 2024 A. Wang
China Telecom
G. Mishra
Verizon Inc.
L. Liu
Fujitsu
X. Liu
IBM Corporation
28 March 2024
BIER-TE for Broadcast Link
draft-chen-bier-te-lan-09
Abstract
This document describes extensions to "Bit Index Explicit Replication
Traffic Engineering" (BIER-TE) for supporting LANs (i.e., broadcast
links). For a multicast packet with an explicit point-to-multipoint
(P2MP) path traversing LANs, the packet is replicated and forwarded
statelessly along the path.
Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119] [RFC8174]
when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 29 September 2024.
Chen, et al. Expires 29 September 2024 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft BIER-TE for LAN March 2024
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Example Application of Current BIER-TE with LAN . . . . . . . 4
2.1. Example BIER-TE Topology with LAN . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2. BIER-TE BIFT on BFR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.3. Example P2MP Path with LAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3. Improved BIER-TE with LAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.1. New BP Assignments for LAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.2. Improved BIER-TE BIFT on BFR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
3.3. Updated Forwarding Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
4. Example Application of Improved BIER-TE . . . . . . . . . . . 19
5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
7. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
1. Introduction
[RFC9262] introduces Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER) Traffic/
Tree Engineering (BIER-TE). It is an architecture for per-packet
stateless explicit point to multipoint (P2MP) multicast path/tree. A
Bit-Forwarding Router (BFR) in a BIER-TE domain has a BIER-TE Bit
Index Forwarding Table (BIFT). A BIER-TE BIFT on a BFR comprises a
forwarding entry for a BitPosition (BP) assigned to each of the
adjacencies of the BFR. If the BP represents a forward connected
adjacency, the forwarding entry for the BP forwards the multicast
packet with the BP to the directly connected BFR neighbor of the
adjacency. If the BP represents a BFER (i.e., egress node) or say a
local decap adjacency, the forwarding entry for the BP decapsulates
Chen, et al. Expires 29 September 2024 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft BIER-TE for LAN March 2024
the multicast packet with the BP and passes a copy of the payload of
the packet to the packet's NextProto within the BFR.
In [RFC9262], for a LAN, the adjacency to each neighboring BFR on the
LAN is given a unique BitPosition. The adjacency of this BitPosition
is a forward connected adjacency towards the BFR and this BitPosition
is populated into the BIFT of all the other BFRs on that LAN. This
solution for a LAN does not work in some cases.
For a packet with an explicit point-to-multipoint (P2MP) path, if the
path traverses some BFRs/nodes on a LAN, each of these BFRs/nodes on
the LAN may receive duplicated packets. Thus some of the egress
nodes will receive duplicated packets.
This document proposes a solution for LANs to resolve this issue.
For a packet with an explicit P2MP path traversing LANs (i.e.,
broadcast links), the packet is replicated and forwarded statelessly
along the path. Each of the egress nodes of the path will not
receive any duplicated packet.
1.1. Terminology
BIER: Bit Index Explicit Replication.
BIER-TE: BIER Traffic Engineering.
BFR: Bit-Forwarding Router.
BFIR: Bit-Forwarding Ingress Router.
BFER: Bit-Forwarding Egress Router.
BFR-id: BFR Identifier. It is a number in the range [1,65535].
BFR-NBR: BFR Neighbor.
BFR-prefix: An IP address (either IPv4 or IPv6) of a BFR.
BIRT: Bit Index Routing Table. It is a table that maps from the
BFR-id (in a particular sub-domain) of a BFER to the BFR-prefix
of that BFER, and to the BFR-NBR on the path to that BFER.
BIFT: Bit Index Forwarding Table.
IGP: Interior Gateway Protocol.
LSDB: Link State DataBase.
Chen, et al. Expires 29 September 2024 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft BIER-TE for LAN March 2024
OSPF: Open Shortest Path First.
IS-IS: Intermediate System to Intermediate System.
2. Example Application of Current BIER-TE with LAN
This section illustrates an example application of the current BIER-
TE defined in [RFC9262] to the BIER-TE topology with LAN in Figure 1.
2.1. Example BIER-TE Topology with LAN
An example BIER-TE topology with a LAN for a BIER-TE domain is shown
in Figure 1. It has 9 nodes/BFRs A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H and K.
Nodes/BFRs D, F, E, H, A and K are BFERs and have local decap
adjacency BitPositions (BPs for short) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
respectively. For simplicity, these BPs are represented by
(SI:BitString), where SI = 0 and BitString is of 8 bits. BPs 1, 2,
3, 4, 5 and 6 are represented by 1 (0:00000001), 2 (0:00000010), 3
(0:00000100), 4 (0:00001000), 5 (0:00010000) and 6 (0:00100000)
respectively.
6
( K )
/14'
/
4' /13' | 4
/-----------( G )--------+ ( H )
/ 16' |________/
/ | 17'
/3' _________|
5 1' 2' / 6' /15' | 18'
( A )------------( B )--------------( C ) +--------( D )
\10' 7'\ 5' \11' | 1
\ \ \ LAN
\ \ \
\ 9' \8' \12'
\--------------( E ) ( F )
3 2
Figure 1: Example BIER-TE Topology with BP to BFR on LAN
The BitPositions for the forward connected adjacencies are
represented by i', where i is from 1 to 18. In one option, they are
encoded as (n+i), where n is a power of 2 such as 32768. For
simplicity, these BitPositions are represented by (SI:BitString),
where SI = (6 + (i-1)/8) and BitString is of 8 bits. BitPositions i'
(i from 1 to 18) are represented by 1'(6:00000001), 2'(6:00000010),
Chen, et al. Expires 29 September 2024 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft BIER-TE for LAN March 2024
3'(6:00000100), 4'(6:00001000), 5'(6:00010000), 6'(6:00100000),
7'(6:01000000), 8'(6:10000000), 9'(7:00000001), 10'(7:00000010), . .
. , 16'(7:10000000), 17'(8:00000001), 18'(8:00000010).
For a link between two nodes X and Y, there are two BitPositions for
two forward connected adjacencies. These two forward connected
adjacency BitPositions are assigned on nodes X and Y respectively.
The BitPosition assigned on X is the forward connected adjacency of
Y. The BitPosition assigned on Y is the forward connected adjacency
of X.
For example, for the link between nodes B and C in the figure, two
forward connected adjacency BitPositions 5' and 6' are assigned to
two ends of the link. BitPosition 5' is assigned on node B to B's
end of the link. It is the forward connected adjacency of node C.
BitPosition 6' is assigned on node C to C's end of the link. It is
the forward connected adjacency of node B.
For a LAN (i.e., broadcast link) connecting nodes X1, X2, ..., Xm,
there are m BitPositions for m forward connected adjacencies. These
m forward connected adjacency BitPositions are assigned on nodes X1,
X2, ..., Xm respectively.
For the LAN connecting 4 nodes C, G, H and D in the figure, 4 forward
connected adjacency BitPositions 15', 16', 17' and 18' are assigned
to C, G, H and D respectively.
2.2. BIER-TE BIFT on BFR
Every BFR in a BIER-TE domain/topology has a BIER-TE BIFT. This
section shows the BIER-TE BIFT on every BFR/node of the BIER-TE
topology with LAN in Figure 1.
For the BIER-TE topology in Figure 1, each of 9 nodes/BFRs A, B, C,
D, E, F, G, H and K has its BIER-TE BIFT for the topology. The BIFT
on a BFR comprises a forwarding entry for each of the adjacencies of
the BFR.
The BIER-TE BIFT on BFR A (i.e., node A) is shown in Figure 2. There
are three adjacencies of A. The 1st one is the forward connected
adjacency from A to B (represented by BP 2'); the 2nd is the forward
connected adjacency from A to E (represented by BP 9'); the 3rd is
the local decap adjacency (represented by BP 5) for BFER (i.e.,
egress) A. The BIFT on A has three forwarding entries.
Chen, et al. Expires 29 September 2024 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft BIER-TE for LAN March 2024
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| Adjacency BP | Action | BFR-NBR |
| (SI:BitString) | | (Next Hop) |
+=================+==============+============+
| 2'(6:00000010) | fw-connected | B |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 9'(7:00000001) | fw-connected | E |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 5 (0:00010000) | local-decap | |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
Figure 2: BIER-TE BIFT on BFR A
The 1st forwarding entry in the BIFT is for BitPosition 2', which is
the forward connected adjacency from A to B. For a multicast packet
with BitPosition 2', which indicates that the P2MP path in the packet
traverses the adjacency from A to B, the forwarding entry forwards
the packet to B along the link from A to B.
The 2nd forwarding entry in the BIFT is for BitPosition 9', which is
the forward connected adjacency from A to E. For a multicast packet
with BitPosition 9', which indicates that the P2MP path in the packet
traverses the adjacency from A to E, the forwarding entry forwards
the packet to E along the link from A to E.
The 3rd forwarding entry in the BIFT locally decapsulates a multicast
packet with BitPosition 5 and passes a copy of the payload of the
packet to the packet's NextProto. It is for BitPosition 5, which is
the local decap adjacency for BFER (i.e., egress) A. For a multicast
packet with BitPosition 5, which indicates that the P2MP path in the
packet has node A as one of its destinations (i.e., egress nodes),
the forwarding entry decapsulates the packet and passes a copy of the
payload of the packet to the packet's NextProto within node A.
The BIER-TE BIFT on BFR B (i.e., node B) is shown in Figure 3. There
are four forward connected adjacencies of B. They are the forward
connected adjacencies from B to A (represented by BP 1'), B to G
(represented by BP 4'), B to C (represented by BP 6') and B to E
(represented by BP 8') respectively. The BIFT on B has four
forwarding entries for these adjacencies.
Chen, et al. Expires 29 September 2024 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft BIER-TE for LAN March 2024
+----------------+--------------+------------+
| Adjacency BP | Action | BFR-NBR |
| (SI:BitString) | | (Next Hop) |
+================+==============+============+
| 1'(6:00000001) | fw-connected | A |
+----------------+--------------+------------+
| 4'(6:00001000) | fw-connected | G |
+----------------+--------------+------------+
| 6'(6:00100000) | fw-connected | C |
+----------------+--------------+------------+
| 8'(6:10000000) | fw-connected | E |
+----------------+--------------+------------+
Figure 3: BIER-TE BIFT on BFR B
The 1st forwarding entry in the BIFT is for BitPosition 1', which is
the forward connected adjacency from B to A. For a multicast packet
with BitPosition 1', which indicates that the P2MP path in the packet
traverses the adjacency from B to A, the forwarding entry forwards
the packet to A along the link from B to A.
The 2nd forwarding entry in the BIFT is for BitPosition 4', which is
the forward connected adjacency from B to G. For a multicast packet
with BitPosition 4', which indicates that the P2MP path in the packet
traverses the adjacency from B to G, the forwarding entry forwards
the packet to G along the link from B to G.
The 3rd forwarding entry in the BIFT is for BitPosition 6', which is
the forward connected adjacency from B to C. For a multicast packet
with BitPosition 6', which indicates that the P2MP path in the packet
traverses the adjacency from B to C, the forwarding entry forwards
the packet to C along the link from B to C.
The 4-th forwarding entry in the BIFT is for BitPosition 8', which is
the forward connected adjacency from B to E. For a multicast packet
with BitPosition 8', which indicates that the P2MP path in the packet
traverses the adjacency from B to E, the forwarding entry forwards
the packet to E along the link from B to E.
The BIER-TE BIFT on BFR C (i.e., node C) is shown in Figure 4. There
are five forward connected adjacencies of C. They are the forward
connected adjacencies from C to B (represented by BP 5'), C to F
(represented by BP 12'), C to G (represented by BP 14'), C to H
(represented by BP 15') and C to D (represented by BP 16')
respectively. The BIFT on C has five forwarding entries for these
adjacencies.
Chen, et al. Expires 29 September 2024 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft BIER-TE for LAN March 2024
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| Adjacency BP | Action | BFR-NBR |
| (SI:BitString) | | (Next Hop) |
+=================+==============+============+
| 5'(6:00010000) | fw-connected | B |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 12'(7:00001000) | fw-connected | F |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 16'(7:10000000) | fw-connected | G |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 17'(8:00000001) | fw-connected | H |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 18'(8:00000010) | fw-connected | D |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
Figure 4: BIER-TE BIFT on BFR C
The BIER-TE BIFT on BFR D (i.e., node D) is shown in Figure 5. There
are four adjacencies of D. Three of them are the forward connected
adjacencies from D to C (represented by BP 13'), D to G (represented
by BP 14') and D to H (represented by BP 15') respectively; the other
is the local decap adjacency (represented by BP 1) for BFER (i.e.,
egress) D. The BIFT on D has four forwarding entries for these
adjacencies.
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| Adjacency BP | Action | BFR-NBR |
| (SI:BitString) | | (Next Hop) |
+=================+==============+============+
| 15'(7:01000000) | fw-connected | C |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 16'(7:10000000) | fw-connected | G |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 17'(8:00000001) | fw-connected | H |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 1 (0:00000001) | local-decap | |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
Figure 5: BIER-TE BIFT on BFR D
The BIER-TE BIFT on BFR E (i.e., node E) is shown in Figure 6. There
are three adjacencies of E. Two of them are the forward connected
adjacencies from E to B (represented by BP 7') and E to A
(represented by BP 10') respectively; the other is the local decap
adjacency (represented by BP 3) for BFER (i.e., egress) E. The BIFT
on E has three forwarding entries for these adjacencies.
Chen, et al. Expires 29 September 2024 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft BIER-TE for LAN March 2024
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| Adjacency BP | Action | BFR-NBR |
| (SI:BitString) | | (Next Hop) |
+=================+==============+============+
| 7'(6:01000000) | fw-connected | B |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 10'(7:00000010) | fw-connected | A |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 3 (0:00000100) | local-decap | |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
Figure 6: BIER-TE BIFT on BFR E
The BIER-TE BIFT on BFR F (i.e., node F) is shown in Figure 7. There
are two adjacencies of F. The 1st one is the forward connected
adjacencies from F to C (represented by BP 11'); the 2nd is the local
decap adjacency (represented by BP 2) for BFER (i.e., egress) F. The
BIFT on F has two forwarding entries for these adjacencies.
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| Adjacency BP | Action | BFR-NBR |
| (SI:BitString) | | (Next Hop) |
+=================+==============+============+
| 11'(7:00000100) | fw-connected | C |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 2 (0:00000010) | local-decap | |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
Figure 7: BIER-TE BIFT on BFR F
The BIER-TE BIFT on BFR G (i.e., node G) is shown in Figure 8. There
are four forward connected adjacencies of G. They are the
adjacencies from G to B (represented by BP 3'), G to C (represented
by BP 13'), G to H (represented by BP 15') and G to D (represented by
BP 16') respectively. The BIFT on G has four forwarding entries for
these adjacencies.
Chen, et al. Expires 29 September 2024 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft BIER-TE for LAN March 2024
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| Adjacency BP | Action | BFR-NBR |
| (SI:BitString) | | (Next Hop) |
+=================+==============+============+
| 3'(6:00000100) | fw-connected | B |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 14'(7:00100000) | fw-connected | K |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 15'(7:01000000) | fw-connected | C |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 17'(8:00000001) | fw-connected | H |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 18'(8:00000010) | fw-connected | D |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
Figure 8: BIER-TE BIFT on BFR G
The BIER-TE BIFT on BFR H (i.e., node H) is shown in Figure 9. There
are four adjacencies of H. Three of them are the forward connected
adjacencies from H to C (represented by BP 13'), H to G (represented
by BP 14') and H to D (represented by BP 16') respectively; the other
is the local decap adjacency (represented by BP 4) for BFER (i.e.,
egress) H. The BIFT on H has four forwarding entries for these
adjacencies.
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| Adjacency BP | Action | BFR-NBR |
| (SI:BitString) | | (Next Hop) |
+=================+==============+============+
| 15'(7:01000000) | fw-connected | C |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 16'(7:10000000) | fw-connected | G |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 18'(8:00000010) | fw-connected | D |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 4 (0:00001000) | local-decap | |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
Figure 9: BIER-TE BIFT on BFR H
2.3. Example P2MP Path with LAN
This section presents the issue about receiving duplicated packets at
BFER H for any explicit P2MP path/tree from BFIR A to BFERs K, H and
F in Figure 1 with minimum height of the tree, which is 3 (hops).
Any path will go through the LAN in order to reach BFER H.
Chen, et al. Expires 29 September 2024 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft BIER-TE for LAN March 2024
There are only following explicit P2MP paths from A to K, H and D.
K K
/14' H /14'
/ |___/17' / H
G---------| G |____/17'
/4' LAN /4' _|
2' / 6' 2' / 6' / |
A--------B----------C A--------B----------C LAN
\ \
\12' \12'
F F
Path 1 from A to K, H and F Path 2 from A to K, H and F
Figure 10: All explicit paths with height 3 from A to K,H and F
Path 1 and path 2 are represented by {2', 4', 6', 12', 14', 17', 2,
4, 6}. Path 1 traverses the link/adjacency from A to B (indicated by
BP 2'), the link/adjacency from B to G (indicated by BP 4'), the
link/adjacency from B to C (indicated by BP 6'), the link/adjacency
from G to K (indicated by BP 14'), the link/adjacency from G to H
(indicated by BP 17') [the link/adjacency from C to H (also indicated
by BP 17') for Path 2], and the link/adjacency from C to F (indicated
by BP 12'). Path 1 is represented by {2', 4', 6', 12', 14', 17', 2,
4, 6}. Path 2 has the same representation. The packet at A has this
representation.
For the packet with the P2MP path, A forwards the packet to B
according to the forwarding entry for BP 2' in its BIFT.
After receiving the packet from A, B forwards the packet to G and C
according to the forwarding entries for BPs 4' and 6' in B's BIFT
respectively. The packet received by G has path {12', 14', 17', 2,
4, 6}. The packet received by C has path {12', 14', 17', 2, 4, 6}.
After receiving the packet from B, G sends a copy of the packet to K
according to the forwarding entry for BP 14' in G's BIFT, and another
copy of the packet to H according to the forwarding entry for BP 17'
in G's BIFT.
After receiving the packet from B, C copies and sends the packet to H
and F according to the forwarding entries for BPs 17' and 12' in C's
BIFT respectively.
Egress node H of the P2MP path receives the duplicated packets. One
packet is from G, and the same copy is from C.
Chen, et al. Expires 29 September 2024 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft BIER-TE for LAN March 2024
The reasons for the path leading to duplicated packets include:
* A BP is local to a node (i.e., for a link connected to the node).
Every node X processes only the BPs in a packet for the links
connected to node X. For example, node A processes only BP 2' for
link from A to B. Node A removes 2' and sends packet to node B
according to the entry for 2' in A's BIER-TE BIFT.
* Missing or no enough information for broadcast link (LAN). There
is a pseudo node for a LAN in IGP (DR in OSPF and DIS in IS-IS)
and the pseudo node is connected to each of the nodes on the LAN.
The BPs for these links are missing.
The solution proposed for LANs in this document resolve this issue.
For a packet with an explicit P2MP path traversing LANs (i.e.,
broadcast links), the packet is replicated and forwarded statelessly
along the path. Each of the egress nodes of the path will not
receive any duplicated packet.
3. Improved BIER-TE with LAN
3.1. New BP Assignments for LAN
For all the nodes/BFRs attached to a LAN (i.e., broadcast link), it
is assumed that they are connected a pseudo node. In one
implementation, the pseudo node is the Designated Router (DR) of the
LAN in OSPF or the Designated Intermediate System (DIS) of the LAN in
IS-IS.
For the connection between the pseudo node and each of the nodes/BFRs
attached to a LAN, two BPs are assigned to it. One is for the
adjacency from the BFR to the pseudo node, the other is for the
adjacency from the pseudo node to the BFR.
The adjacency from a BFR to the pseudo node is called a LAN
adjacency. The adjacency from the pseudo node to a BFR is a forward
connected adjacency.
For example, suppose that the pseudo node for the LAN in Figure 1 is
Px. The BP assignments for the LAN (i.e., connections between Px and
BFRs C, G, H and D) are illustrated in Figure 11.
Chen, et al. Expires 29 September 2024 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft BIER-TE for LAN March 2024
6
( K )
/14'
/
4' /13' | 4
/-----------( G )---------+ ( H )
/ 17' | ________/
/ 18'| /20' 19'
/3' _________ Px
5 1' 2' / 6' /15' 16' |22' 21'
( A )------------( B )--------------( C ) +---------( D )
\10' 7'\ 5' \11' 1
\ \ \
\ \ \
\ 9' \8' \12'
\--------------( E ) ( F )
3 2
Figure 11: Example BIER-TE Topology with BPs for LAN
The connection/adjacency from Px to C is assigned BP 15', and the
connection/adjacency from C to Px is assigned BP 16'.
The connection/adjacency from Px to G is assigned BP 17', and the
connection/adjacency from G to Px is assigned BP 18'.
The connection/adjacency from Px to H is assigned BP 19', and the
connection/adjacency from H to Px is assigned BP 20'.
The connection/adjacency from Px to D is assigned BP 21', and the
connection/adjacency from D to Px is assigned BP 22'.
In an alternative, all the nodes/BFRs attached to a LAN are assumed
fully connected each other (i.e., they are fully meshed). For a
connection between any two BFRs on the LAN, two forward connected
adjacencies are assigned to the two ends of the connection.
For example, there are four BFRs C, G, H and D attached to the LAN in
Figure 1. There are six connections among these four BFRs. They are
connections between C and G, C and H, C and D, G and H, G and D, H
and D. Twelve BPs are needed for these six connections.
In general, for n BFRs attached to a LAN, there are n*(n-1)/2
connections among these n BFRs and n*(n-1) BPs are needed for these
connections. This may not be scalable. But for this alternative,
the BIER-TE BIFT on a BFR needs not to be changed except for
considering the full mesh connections among the BFRs attached to a
LAN.
Chen, et al. Expires 29 September 2024 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft BIER-TE for LAN March 2024
3.2. Improved BIER-TE BIFT on BFR
Each BFR in a BIER-TE domain has a BIER-TE BIFT. For a BFR not
attached to any LAN, the BIER-TE BIFT on the BFR is the same as
before. For a BFR attached to a LAN, its BIER-TE BIFT is changed for
considering the LAN.
For example, BFRs C, G, H and D are attached to a LAN in Figure 1.
The BIER-TE BIFT on each of these four BFRs is changed for the new BP
assignments for the LAN in Figure 11.
For a BFR attached to a LAN, suppose that the pseudo node for the LAN
is Px. The improved BIER-TE BIFT on the BFR comprises a forwarding
entry for the LAN adjacency from the BFR to Px and a secondary BIFT
for Px. The secondary BIFT for Px on the BFR contains a forwarding
entry for each of the forward connected adjacencies from Px to the
BFRs attached to the LAN except for the adjacency from Px to the BFR.
For example, the improved BIER-TE BIFT on BFR C is illustrated in
Figure 12. It comprises the forwarding entry for the LAN adjacency
from C to Px (indicated by BP 16') and the secondary BIFT for Px on
BFR C. The secondary BIFT contains three forwarding entries for
three forward connected adjacencies from Px to G (indicated by 17'),
Px to H (indicated by 19') and Px to D (indicated by 21')
respectively.
Chen, et al. Expires 29 September 2024 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft BIER-TE for LAN March 2024
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| Adjacency BP | Action | BFR-NBR |
| (SI:BitString) | | (Next Hop) |
+=================+==============+============+
| 17'(8:00000001) | fw-connected | G |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 19'(8:00000100) | fw-connected | H |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 21'(8:00010000) | fw-connected | D |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
Secondary BIFT for Px on BFR C
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| Adjacency BP | Action | BFR-NBR |
| (SI:BitString) | | (Next Hop) |
+=================+==============+============+
| 5'(6:00010000) | fw-connected | B |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 12'(7:00001000) | fw-connected | F |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 16'(7:10000000) |lan-connected | Px |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
Figure 12: Improved BIER-TE BIFT on BFR C
The improved BIER-TE BIFT on BFR G is illustrated in Figure 13. It
comprises the forwarding entry for the LAN adjacency from G to Px
(indicated by BP 18') and the secondary BIFT for Px on BFR G. The
secondary BIFT contains three forwarding entries for three forward
connected adjacencies from Px to C (indicated by 15'), Px to H
(indicated by 19') and Px to D (indicated by 21') respectively.
Chen, et al. Expires 29 September 2024 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft BIER-TE for LAN March 2024
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| Adjacency BP | Action | BFR-NBR |
| (SI:BitString) | | (Next Hop) |
+=================+==============+============+
| 15'(7:01000000) | fw-connected | C |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 19'(8:00000100) | fw-connected | H |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 21'(8:00010000) | fw-connected | D |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
Secondary BIFT for Px on BFR G
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| Adjacency BP | Action | BFR-NBR |
| (SI:BitString) | | (Next Hop) |
+=================+==============+============+
| 3'(6:00000100) | fw-connected | B |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 14'(7:00100000) | fw-connected | K |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 18'(8:00000010) |lan-connected | Px |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
Figure 13: Improved BIER-TE BIFT on BFR G
The improved BIER-TE BIFT on BFR H is illustrated in Figure 14. It
comprises the forwarding entry for the LAN adjacency from H to Px
(indicated by BP 20') and the secondary BIFT for Px on BFR H. The
secondary BIFT contains three forwarding entries for three forward
connected adjacencies from Px to C (indicated by 15'), Px to G
(indicated by 17') and Px to D (indicated by 21') respectively.
Chen, et al. Expires 29 September 2024 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft BIER-TE for LAN March 2024
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| Adjacency BP | Action | BFR-NBR |
| (SI:BitString) | | (Next Hop) |
+=================+==============+============+
| 15'(7:01000000) | fw-connected | C |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 17'(8:00000001) | fw-connected | G |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 21'(8:00010000) | fw-connected | D |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
Secondary BIFT for Px on BFR H
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| Adjacency BP | Action | BFR-NBR |
| (SI:BitString) | | (Next Hop) |
+=================+==============+============+
| 4 (0:00001000) | local-decap | |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 20'(8:00001000) |lan-connected | Px |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
Figure 14: Improved BIER-TE BIFT on BFR H
The improved BIER-TE BIFT on BFR D is illustrated in Figure 15. It
comprises the forwarding entry for the LAN adjacency from D to Px
(indicated by BP 22') and the secondary BIFT for Px on BFR D. The
secondary BIFT contains three forwarding entries for three forward
connected adjacencies from Px to C (indicated by 15'), Px to G
(indicated by 17') and Px to H (indicated by 19') respectively.
Chen, et al. Expires 29 September 2024 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft BIER-TE for LAN March 2024
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| Adjacency BP | Action | BFR-NBR |
| (SI:BitString) | | (Next Hop) |
+=================+==============+============+
| 15'(7:01000000) | fw-connected | C |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 17'(8:00000001) | fw-connected | G |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 19'(8:00000100) | fw-connected | H |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
Secondary BIFT for Px on BFR D
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| Adjacency BP | Action | BFR-NBR |
| (SI:BitString) | | (Next Hop) |
+=================+==============+============+
| 1 (0:00000001) | local-decap | |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
| 22'(8:00000100) |lan-connected | Px |
+-----------------+--------------+------------+
Figure 15: Improved BIER-TE BIFT on BFR D
3.3. Updated Forwarding Procedure
The forwarding procedure defined in [RFC9262] is updated/enhanced for
using an improved BIER-TE BIFT to support BIER-TE with LAN.
The updated procedure is described in Figure 16. For a multicast
packet containing the BitString encoding an explicit P2MP path, if
the BP in the BitString is for a LAN adjacency to pseudo node Px for
the LAN, the updated forwarding procedure on a BFR sends the packet
towards Px's next hop nodes on the P2MP path encoded in the packet.
The procedure on a BFR "sends" (i.e., works as sending) the packet
with the BP for the LAN adjacency to Px according to the forwarding
entry for the BP in the improved BIER-TE BIFT on the BFR. And then
it acts on Px to "send" (i.e., works as sending) the packet to each
of the Px's next hop nodes that are on the P2MP path using the
secondary BIFT for Px.
It obtains the secondary BIFT for Px on the BFR, clears all the BPs
for the adjacencies of the BFR including the adjacency from the BFR
to Px, copies and sends the packet to each of the Px's next hop nodes
on the P2MP path using the secondary BIFT for Px.
Chen, et al. Expires 29 September 2024 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft BIER-TE for LAN March 2024
For each Px's next hop node on the P2MP path, which is represented by
BP j in the packet's BitString, it gets the forwarding entry for BP j
from the secondary BIFT for Px, copies the packet, updates the copy's
BitString by clearing all the BPs for Px's adjacencies, and sends the
updated copy to the next hop node according to the forwarding entry.
Packet = the packet received by BFR;
FOR each BP k (from the rightmost in Packet's BitString) {
IF BP k is local decap adjacency (or say BP of BFER) {
Copies Packet, sends the copy to the multicast
flow overlay and clears bit k in Packet's BitString
} ELSE IF BP k is forward connected adjacency of the BFR {
Finds the forwarding entry in the BIER-TE BIFT using BP k,
Copies Packet, updates the copy's BitString by
clearing all the BPs for the adjacencies of the BFR,
and sends the updated copy to BFR-NBR
} ELSE IF BP k is LAN adjacency to Px {
Obtains the secondary BIFT for Px,
Clears all the BPs for the adjacencies of the BFR,
FOR each BP j (from the rightmost in Packet's BitString) {
IF BP j is Px's forward connected adjacency {
Gets the forwarding entry for BP j in the
secondary BIFT for Px,
Copies Packet, updates the copy's BitString by
clearing all the BPs for Px's adjacencies,
and sends the updated copy to BFR-NBR
}
}
}
}
Figure 16: Updated Forwarding Procedure
4. Example Application of Improved BIER-TE
This section illustrates an example application of improved BIER-TE
to Figure 1. It shows the forwarding behaviors along an explicit
P2MP path in Figure 11 going through the LAN in the figure.
The new BP assignments for the LAN in Figure 1 is shown in Figure 11.
The improved BIER-TE BIFT on each of the BFRs attached to the LAN is
given in Section 3.2.
The explicit P2MP path traverses the link/adjacency from A to B
(indicated by BP 2'), the link/adjacency from B to G (indicated by BP
4') and the link/adjacency from B to C (indicated by BP 6'), the
link/adjacency from G to K (indicated by BP 14'), the link/adjacency
Chen, et al. Expires 29 September 2024 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft BIER-TE for LAN March 2024
from G to Px (indicated by BP 18'), the link/adjacency from C to F
(indicated by BP 12'), and the link/adjacency from Px to H (indicated
by BP 19'). This path is represented by {2', 4', 6', 12', 14', 18',
19', 2, 4, 6}. The packet at A has this path.
For the packet with the P2MP path, A forwards the packet to B
according to the forwarding entry for BP 2' in its BIFT.
After receiving the packet from A, B forwards the packet to G and C
according to the forwarding entries for BPs 4' and 6' in B's BIFT
respectively. The packet received by G has path {12', 14', 18', 19',
2, 4, 6}. The packet received by C has path {12', 14', 18', 19', 2,
4, 6}.
After receiving the packet from B, G sends a copy of the packet to K
according to the forwarding entry for BP 14' in G's improved BIER-TE
BIFT and "sends" another copy of the packet to Px according to the
forwarding entry for BP 18' in G's improved BIER-TE BIFT. After
receiving the packet from G, which has path {12', 19', 2, 4, 6}, Px
"sends" the packet to H according to the forwarding entry for BP 19'
in the secondary BIFT for Px (a part of G's improved BIER-TE BIFT).
After receiving the packet from G, which has path {12', 19', 2, 4,
6}, K decapsulates the packet and passes a copy of the payload of the
packet to the packet's NextProto within node K according to the
forwarding entry for BP 6 in K's BIFT.
After receiving the packet from G, which has path {12', 2, 4, 6}, H
decapsulates the packet and passes a copy of the payload of the
packet to the packet's NextProto within node H according to the
forwarding entry for BP 4 in H's improved BIER-TE BIFT.
After receiving the packet from B, which has path {12', 14', 18',
19', 2, 4, 6}, C sends the packet to F according to the forwarding
entry for BP 12' in C's improved BIER-TE BIFT.
After receiving the packet from C, which has path {14', 18', 19', 2,
4, 6}, F decapsulates the packet and passes a copy of the payload of
the packet to the packet's NextProto within node F according to the
forwarding entry for BP 2 in F's BIER-TE BIFT.
Egress node H of the P2MP path does not receive any duplicated
packet.
5. Security Considerations
TBD.
Chen, et al. Expires 29 September 2024 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft BIER-TE for LAN March 2024
6. IANA Considerations
No requirements for IANA.
7. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Greg Shepherd and Sandy Zhang for
their comments on this work.
8. References
8.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC8556] Rosen, E., Ed., Sivakumar, M., Przygienda, T., Aldrin, S.,
and A. Dolganow, "Multicast VPN Using Bit Index Explicit
Replication (BIER)", RFC 8556, DOI 10.17487/RFC8556, April
2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8556>.
[RFC9262] Eckert, T., Ed., Menth, M., and G. Cauchie, "Tree
Engineering for Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER-TE)",
RFC 9262, DOI 10.17487/RFC9262, October 2022,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9262>.
8.2. Informative References
[RFC8296] Wijnands, IJ., Ed., Rosen, E., Ed., Dolganow, A.,
Tantsura, J., Aldrin, S., and I. Meilik, "Encapsulation
for Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER) in MPLS and Non-
MPLS Networks", RFC 8296, DOI 10.17487/RFC8296, January
2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8296>.
Authors' Addresses
Huaimo Chen
Futurewei
Boston, MA,
United States of America
Email: hchen.ietf@gmail.com
Chen, et al. Expires 29 September 2024 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft BIER-TE for LAN March 2024
Mike McBride
Futurewei
Email: michael.mcbride@futurewei.com
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
Beiqijia Town, Changping District
Beijing
102209
China
Email: wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn
Gyan S. Mishra
Verizon Inc.
13101 Columbia Pike
Silver Spring, MD 20904
United States of America
Phone: 301 502-1347
Email: gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com
Lei Liu
Fujitsu
United States of America
Email: liulei.kddi@gmail.com
Xufeng Liu
IBM Corporation
United States of America
Email: xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com
Chen, et al. Expires 29 September 2024 [Page 22]