Skip to main content

Problem Statement for MIPv6 Interactions with GPRS/UMTS Packet Filtering
draft-chen-mip6-gprs-07

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Expired & archived
Author Xiaobao Chen
Last updated 2007-02-01
RFC stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:

Abstract

This document provides an analysis of certain inter-working problems between IPv6 nodes running Mobile IPv6, at least one of which is connected to a Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) specified General Packet Radio Service/Universal Mobile Tele- communications System (GPRS/UMTS) network. The inter-working problems are caused by some specific packet filtering operations at the edge of the GPRS/UMTS network which are applied to control access to the GPRS/UMTS services and network resources. However, we believe that other scenarios may exist in which similar packet filtering operations may be applied and that similar problems would arise in these more general scenarios. The GPRS Gateway Support Node (GGSN) checks the source address or the destination address in the basic IPv6 header of incoming or outgoing IP datagrams against a set of packet filtering information established during the GPRS/UMTS session set-up. The packet filtering information remains stable during the sessions and independent of Mobile IP. When MIPv6 is activated by either end of the IPv6 mobile nodes, the packet filtering will fail to perform properly and subsequently block the traffic due to the mismatch between the packet filters and the current source address or destination address in the basic IPv6 header of the IP datagrams to and from the IPv6 mobile nodes.

Authors

Xiaobao Chen

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)