Prefix Delegation in 4V6
draft-chen-softwire-4v6-pd-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Gang Chen , Tao Sun , DENG Hui | ||
| Last updated | 2012-03-26 (Latest revision 2011-08-26) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This draft presents the investigation of 4via6 in the scenario where IPv6 prefix delegation is deployed. A practicable application scenarios with IPv6 prefix delegation have been introduced in the mobile network environments. The applicability of 4via6 mechnism has been analyzed in term of mapping rules and 4via6 address structure. Targeting to alignment with existing 4via6 mapping algorithm and RFC6052 recommendation, an alternative 4via6 address structure have been proposed to be capable of assigning flexible address/port set to 4via6 domains.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)