%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-spring-sr-policy-cp-validity instead of this I-D.
@techreport{chen-spring-sr-policy-cp-validity-03,
    number =    {draft-chen-spring-sr-policy-cp-validity-03},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-spring-sr-policy-cp-validity/03/},
    author =    {Ran Chen and Yisong Liu and Ketan Talaulikar and Samuel Sidor and Detao Zhao and Changwang Lin and Zafar Ali},
    title =     {{Validity of SR Policy Candidate Path}},
    pagetotal = 6,
    year =      2024,
    month =     jul,
    day =       21,
    abstract =  {An SR Policy comprises one or more candidate paths (CP) of which at a given time one and only one may be active (i.e., installed in forwarding and usable for steering of traffic). Each CP in turn may have one or more SID-List of which one or more may be active; when multiple SID-List are active then traffic is load balanced over them. However, a candidate path is valid when at least one SID-List is active. This candidate path validity criterion cannot meet the needs of some scenarios. This document defines the new candidate path validity criterion.},
}