KARP IS-IS security gap analysis
draft-chunduri-karp-is-is-gap-analysis-01
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Expired".
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Uma Chunduri , Albert Tian , Wenhu Lu | ||
| Last updated | 2012-09-13 (Latest revision 2012-03-12) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document analyzes the threats applicable for Intermediate system to Intermediate system (IS-IS) routing protocol and security gaps according to the KARP Design Guide. This document also provides specific requirements to address the gaps with both manual and auto key management protocols.
Authors
Uma Chunduri
Albert Tian
Wenhu Lu
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)