IS-IS Multi Topology Deployment Considerations
draft-chunduri-lsr-isis-mt-deployment-cons-02
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Uma Chunduri , Jeff Tantsura , Shraddha Hegde | ||
| Last updated | 2019-11-20 (Latest revision 2019-05-19) | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
plain text
htmlized
pdfized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-chunduri-lsr-isis-mt-deployment-cons-02.txt
Abstract
This document analyzes IS-IS Multi Topology (MT) applicability in various deployments (Core/Mobile Backhaul/Data Center underlays). This document explores the nuances around the terminology and usage of various IS-IS address families, topologies with different considerations, for choosing the right combination for a specific deployment scenario. This document also discusses various ways one can deploy IPv6 only IS-IS topology.
Authors
Uma Chunduri
Jeff Tantsura
Shraddha Hegde
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)