Cisco Systems NetFlow Services Export Version 9
draft-claise-netflow-9-08
Yes
(Bert Wijnen)
No Objection
(Margaret Cullen)
(Russ Housley)
(Steven Bellovin)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.
Bert Wijnen Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Allison Mankin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2004-01-08)
Unknown
I think we should not lose sight of the goal here. Netflow has a ton of flaws, that's why the IPFIX WG exists. But it is probably useful for there to be a spec of netflow for the community. I suggest that this spec get published promptly with a note on it: This documents the original protocol. The IETF IPFIX WG is developing a new protocol meeting the same requirements, but also built with security and inherent congestion aware transport. We should give clarity suggestions, but not ask the authors to make technical changes...
Margaret Cullen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ned Freed Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2004-01-03)
Unknown
I would have expected the risks of exposure of flow information to at least be mentioned in the security considerations section. We're talking about traffic analysis here, after all. Perhaps a reference to the discussion of these isssues in draft-ietf-ipfix-reqs-12.txt is in order?
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Steven Bellovin Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown