%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv instead of this I-D. @techreport{cppy-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-08, number = {draft-cppy-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-08}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cppy-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv/08/}, author = {Camilo Cardona and Paolo Lucente and Pierre Francois and Yunan Gu and Thomas Graf}, title = {{BMP Extension for Path Status TLV}}, pagetotal = 9, year = 2021, month = apr, day = 27, abstract = {The BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) provides an interface for obtaining BGP Path information. BGP Path Information is conveyed within BMP Route Monitoring (RM) messages. This document proposes an extension to BMP to convey the status of a BGP path before and after being processed by the BGP best-path selection algorithm. This extension makes use of the TLV mechanims described in draft-ietf-grow-bmp-tlv {[}I-D.ietf-grow-bmp-tlv{]} and draft-lucente-grow-bmp-tlv-ebit {[}I-D.lucente-grow-bmp-tlv-ebit{]}.}, }