On Popularity versus Quality
draft-cridland-rfc-labels-00

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Last updated 2014-03-07 (latest revision 2013-09-03)
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
pdf htmlized bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-cridland-rfc-labels-00.txt

Abstract

Any RFC is typically seen as having the approval of the IETF community; Standards Track documents even more so. This document explores the distinction between approval based on specification quality, and approval based on high deployment.

Authors

Dave Cridland (dcridland@arcode.com)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)