On Popularity versus Quality
draft-cridland-rfc-labels-00
Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Author | Dave Cridland | ||
Last updated | 2014-03-07 (Latest revision 2013-09-03) | ||
RFC stream | (None) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Any RFC is typically seen as having the approval of the IETF community; Standards Track documents even more so. This document explores the distinction between approval based on specification quality, and approval based on high deployment.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)