%% You should probably cite rfc7221 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{crocker-id-adoption-08,
    number =    {draft-crocker-id-adoption-08},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-crocker-id-adoption/08/},
    author =    {Adrian Farrel and Dave Crocker},
    title =     {{Handling of Internet Drafts by IETF Working Groups}},
    pagetotal = 14,
    year =      2014,
    month =     feb,
    day =       7,
    abstract =  {The productive output of an IETF working group is documents, as mandated by the working group's charter. When a working group is ready to develop a particular document, the most common mechanism is for it to "adopt" an existing document as a starting point. The document that a working group adopts and then develops further is based on initial input at varying levels of maturity. An initial working group draft might be a document already in wide use, or it might be a blank sheet, wholly created by the working group, or it might represent any level of maturity in between. This document discusses how a working group typically handles the formal documents that it targets for publication.},
}