The application/json Media Type for JavaScript Object Notation (JSON)
draft-crockford-jsonorg-json-04
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
(Scott Hollenbeck; former steering group member) Yes
(Allison Mankin; former steering group member) No Objection
If for any action, it would be an Note to the RFC Editor, but this is mainly for the APP intellectual apparatus: Out of curiosity - I'm surprised by RFC 20 being this doc's cite for ASCII. I see that Wikipedia includes this reference (also RFC 1345, which was not yet made Historic, but maybe should be). RFC 20 is very short and clear - is it still an accurate* source for ASCII?
(Bert Wijnen; former steering group member) No Objection
I had to read quite a bit of the document before I realized that this document basically is just requesting a MIME-type registration and has good documentation to go with it first. So I wondered if the title would be better changed to somethinge like: The application/json media Type for JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Bert
(Bill Fenner; former steering group member) No Objection
(Brian Carpenter; former steering group member) No Objection
(David Kessens; former steering group member) No Objection
(Margaret Cullen; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
(Sam Hartman; former steering group member) No Objection
This really belongs in the application subtree not the text subtree. It is my understanding that is already being dealt with.
(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection