A Proposal for a two-ended connection model for MGCP
draft-cuervo-megaco-mgcp-compromise-00
Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Nancy Greene , Fernando Cuervo , Graeme A. Gibbs , Peter Blatherwick | ||
Last updated | 1999-03-01 | ||
RFC stream | (None) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
The connection model in MGCP grew from a half-connection model, to, more recently, a model that allows a second edgepoint to be specified [3]. In this document, we have taken the connection model a step further, making it symmetrical, identifying the difference between external connections and an MG- connection, allowing signalling related commands to be asso- ciated with either edgepoint, or with both edgepoints in an MG. While the half-connection model may work best for the simple case of MGs with an external IP connection on one side, the proposed more general connec- tion model adapts easily when the MG is for packet to packet connec- tions, when the MG is TDM on one side and IP on the other, as well as when the external connections are ATM on either side of an MG.
Authors
Nancy Greene
Fernando Cuervo
Graeme A. Gibbs
Peter Blatherwick
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)