%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mfp-use-case-and-requirements instead of this I-D.
@techreport{cui-mpls-tp-mfp-use-case-and-requirements-08,
    number =    {draft-cui-mpls-tp-mfp-use-case-and-requirements-08},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cui-mpls-tp-mfp-use-case-and-requirements/08/},
    author =    {Zhenlong Cui and Rolf Winter and Himanshu C. Shah and Sam Aldrin and Masahiro Daikoku},
    title =     {{Use Cases and Requirements for MPLS-TP multi-failure protection}},
    pagetotal = 8,
    year =      2016,
    month =     jan,
    day =       12,
    abstract =  {For the Multiprotocol Label Switching Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) linear protection capable of 1+1 and 1:1 protection has already been defined. That linear protection mechanism has not been designed for handling multiple, simultaneously occuring failures, i.e. multiple failures that affect the working and the protection entity during the same time period. In these situations currently defined protection mechanisms would fail. This document introduces use cases and requirements for mechanisms that are capable of protecting against such failures. It does not specify a multi-failure protection mechanism itself.},
}