The "_for-sale" Underscored and Globally Scoped DNS Node Name
draft-davids-forsalereg-21

Yes

Mohamed Boucadair

No Objection

Andy Newton
Deb Cooley
Éric Vyncke
Gorry Fairhurst
Jim Guichard
Ketan Talaulikar
Mike Bishop
Roman Danyliw
(Erik Kline)
(Paul Wouters)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 19 and is now closed.

Mohamed Boucadair
Yes
Andy Newton
No Objection
Comment (2026-02-03 for -20) Not sent 
# Andy Newton, ART AD, comments for draft-davids-forsalereg-20
CC @anewton1998

* line numbers:
  - https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/idnits?url=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-davids-forsalereg-20.txt&submitcheck=True

* comment syntax:
  - https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md

* "Handling Ballot Positions":
  - https://ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/

## Thanks to the Reviewers

Many thanks to Takahiro Nemoto for the two ARTART reviews.


## Comments

Thank you for addressing the concerns that occured during Last Call, and for removing the Ethical Considerations
from this document.
Deb Cooley
No Objection
Comment (2026-02-05 for -20) Sent 
Thanks to Watson Ladd for their secdir review.

I also agree with Mike Bishop and Gorry Fairhurst on the RECOMMENDED use of http, it should not be recommended, or at least addressed as an issue in Section 4 (section 2.2.3).
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Comment (2026-02-05 for -20) Sent 
This can indeed be useful ;-) thanks for doing it in the IETF stream.

Like others, I would prefer not having "RECOMMEND http".

Also, should there be a registry for all tag rather than an open-ended section 2.2.5 about 'future tags' ?
Gorry Fairhurst
No Objection
Comment (2026-02-01 for -19) Sent 
It would be good to know that the use of unencrypted http has been considered and it would be nice to see a little text relating to these considerations in the Security Considerations section. (See similar comment by Mike Bishop.)
Jim Guichard
No Objection
Ketan Talaulikar
No Objection
Mike Bishop
No Objection
Comment (2026-01-27 for -19) Sent 
I'm somewhat surprised to see unencrypted "http" as a RECOMMENDED URI scheme. I would omit it; we should RECOMMEND the use of a mechanism that includes some authentication.
Roman Danyliw
(was Abstain) No Objection
Comment (2026-02-03 for -20) Sent 
Thank for you addressing all of my feedback.
Erik Kline Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -19) Not sent 

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Paul Wouters Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    (for -19)
                                
                                
                                    
                                         Not sent