%% You should probably cite draft-davis-nmop-some-refinements-to-rfc8345 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{davis-opsawg-some-refinements-to-rfc8345-01,
    number =    {draft-davis-opsawg-some-refinements-to-rfc8345-01},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-davis-opsawg-some-refinements-to-rfc8345/01/},
    author =    {Nigel Davis and Olga Havel and Benoît Claise},
    title =     {{Some Refinements to Network Topologies (RFC8345)}},
    pagetotal = 29,
    year =      2024,
    month =     jan,
    day =       10,
    abstract =  {This draft provides a brief analysis of the current unidirectional point-to-point approach to modeling of the link in RFC8345, highlights why this is not sufficient and makes a proposal to enhance RFC8345 YANG to support multipoint uni/bi links. The two alternative enhancement approaches proposed are backward compatible. The enhancement is such that it provides a uniform solution to modeling all links that could, over time, replace the current unidirectional point-to-point approach. The rationale for the change is based on many years of practical experience, including challenges using RFC8345 in actual solution development, and insight gained through other standardisation efforts and deployments.},
}