%% You should probably cite draft-dawra-idr-bgp-ls-sr-service-segments instead of this I-D.
@techreport{dawra-idr-bgp-sr-service-chaining-02,
    number =    {draft-dawra-idr-bgp-sr-service-chaining-02},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dawra-idr-bgp-sr-service-chaining/02/},
    author =    {Gaurav Dawra and Clarence Filsfils and Daniel Bernier and Jim Uttaro and Bruno Decraene and Hani Elmalky and Xiaohu Xu and Francois Clad and Ketan Talaulikar},
    title =     {{BGP Control Plane Extensions for Segment Routing based Service Chaining}},
    pagetotal = 13,
    year =      2018,
    month =     jan,
    day =       4,
    abstract =  {The BGP Control Plane for the SR service-chaining solution is consistent with the BGP Control Plane for the topological Segment Routing Traffic Engineering (SR-TE) solution. o BGP Link-State(BGP-LS) address-family/sub-address-family{[}RFC7752{]} is used to discover service and topological characteristics from the network. o SR-TE policies{[}I-D.ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy{]} instantiate source-routed policies that may mix service and topological segments.},
}