''HTTP Envy'' and Presence Information Protocols
draft-day-envy-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Mark Day | ||
| Last updated | 1998-03-16 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
There are a variety of proposals [Calsyn, Mohr] for building a presence information protocol as a variant or version of HTTP. This document summarizes why I believe that is not a good idea.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)