%% You should probably cite draft-dbenham-webrtc-videomti-02 instead of this revision.
@techreport{dbenham-webrtc-videomti-00,
    number =    {draft-dbenham-webrtc-videomti-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dbenham-webrtc-videomti/00/},
    author =    {David Benham and David Singer and Krasimir Kolarov},
    title =     {{H.264/AVC as Mandatory-to-Implement Video Codec for RTCweb}},
    pagetotal = 10,
    year =      2012,
    month =     oct,
    day =       15,
    abstract =  {This memo proposes that H.264/AVC be selected as the mandatory-to- implement (MTI) video codec for RTCweb due to is Adoption Advantage, Quality-Power-Bandwidth advantage, Hardware Acceleration Advantage and Well-established IPR Status.},
}