H.264/AVC as Mandatory-to-Implement Video Codec for RTCweb
draft-dbenham-webrtc-videomti-02
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | David Benham , David Singer , Krasimir Kolarov | ||
| Last updated | 2014-03-03 (Latest revision 2013-08-27) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This memo proposes that H.264/AVC be selected as the mandatory-to- implement (MTI) video codec for RTCweb due to is Adoption Advantage, Quality-Power-Bandwidth advantage, Hardware Acceleration Advantage and Well-established IPR Status.
Authors
David Benham
David Singer
Krasimir Kolarov
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)