Applicability Statement for Provider Provisioned CE-based Virtual Private Networks using IPsec
draft-declercq-l3vpn-ce-based-as-00
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2015-10-14
|
00 | (System) | Notify list changed from rick@rhwilder.net, rcallon@juniper.net, rbonica@juniper.net, jeremy.de_clercq@alcatel.be, dave.mcdysan@wcom.com, cliff.wang@us.army.mil to cliff.wang@us.army.mil, rbonica@juniper.net, rcallon@juniper.net, dave.mcdysan@wcom.com, rick@rhwilder.net |
2007-05-07
|
00 | (System) | This was part of a ballot set with: draft-ietf-l3vpn-ce-based |
2007-05-07
|
00 | Dinara Suleymanova | State Changes to Dead from IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed by Dinara Suleymanova |
2006-11-30
|
00 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
2006-11-30
|
00 | Cullen Jennings | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Cullen Jennings has been changed to Undefined from No Objection by Cullen Jennings |
2006-11-30
|
00 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation - Defer by Amy Vezza |
2006-11-30
|
00 | Magnus Westerlund | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund |
2006-11-29
|
00 | David Kessens | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by David Kessens |
2006-11-29
|
00 | Dan Romascanu | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu |
2006-11-29
|
00 | Lisa Dusseault | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault |
2006-11-29
|
00 | Sam Hartman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Sam Hartman |
2006-11-29
|
00 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ted Hardie |
2006-11-29
|
00 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Jari Arkko |
2006-11-29
|
00 | Lars Eggert | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded by Lars Eggert |
2006-11-29
|
00 | Brian Carpenter | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Brian Carpenter |
2006-11-27
|
00 | Cullen Jennings | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings |
2006-11-17
|
00 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2006-11-16 |
2006-11-13
|
00 | Lisa Dusseault | State Changes to IESG Evaluation - Defer from IESG Evaluation by Lisa Dusseault |
2006-11-13
|
00 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Russ Housley |
2006-11-09
|
00 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to Love Astrand |
2006-11-09
|
00 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to Love Astrand |
2006-10-30
|
00 | Ross Callon | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ross Callon has been changed to Recuse from Yes by Ross Callon |
2006-10-30
|
00 | Ross Callon | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Ross Callon |
2006-10-30
|
00 | Mark Townsley | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Mark Townsley |
2006-10-30
|
00 | Mark Townsley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Mark Townsley |
2006-10-30
|
00 | Mark Townsley | Ballot has been issued by Mark Townsley |
2006-10-30
|
00 | Mark Townsley | Created "Approve" ballot |
2006-10-30
|
00 | Mark Townsley | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2006-11-16 by Mark Townsley |
2006-09-18
|
00 | Yoshiko Fong | IANA Last Call Comment: NO IANA Considerations section. We understand this document to have no IANA Actions. |
2006-09-04
|
00 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system |
2006-08-21
|
00 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
2006-08-21
|
00 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
2006-08-21
|
00 | Mark Townsley | State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::External Party by Mark Townsley |
2006-08-21
|
00 | Mark Townsley | Last Call was requested by Mark Townsley |
2006-08-21
|
00 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2006-08-21
|
00 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2006-08-21
|
00 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2006-08-21
|
00 | Mark Townsley | Note field has been cleared by Mark Townsley |
2006-08-21
|
00 | Mark Townsley | Merged with draft-ietf-l3vpn-ce-based by Mark Townsley |
2006-05-11
|
00 | Mark Townsley | Toggled 2005-04-22 comment to private as it was not intended for this spec, that comment was intended for draft-ietf-l3vpn-as-vr-01.txt |
2006-03-06
|
00 | Mark Townsley | [Note]: 'Sent request to chairs and authors asking for status update.' added by Mark Townsley |
2005-04-22
|
00 | Mark Townsley | State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation by Mark Townsley |
2005-04-22
|
00 | Mark Townsley | [Note]: ' Waiting on document update from Ananth -------- Original Message -------- Subject: More, Re: Fwd: Re: L3VPN IPsec and VR documents Date: Thu, 14 … [Note]: ' Waiting on document update from Ananth -------- Original Message -------- Subject: More, Re: Fwd: Re: L3VPN IPsec and VR documents Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 12:12:47 -0400 From: Ross Callon To: W. Mark Townsley CC: paul.knight@nortelnetworks.com, narten@us.ibm.com, margaret@thingmagic.com, rick@rhwilder.net, rbonica@juniper.net References: <425D908C.5080002@cisco.com> <6204FDDE129D364D8040A98BCCB290EF151C6CFD@zbl6c004.corpeast.baynetworks.com> <6204FDDE129D364D8040A98BCCB290EF151C6CFD@zbl6c004.corpeast.baynetworks.com> Looking through old email, I found a message from me dated January 19th containing comments on the VR applicability statement (as well as VR architecture), and a reply from Ananth saying he was intending to update it. This missed the comment in my email from last night regarding the first paragraph from section 13. I therefore have pinged Ananth asking for him to update the AS, and included comments on the paragraph in section 13. I think that the next step is to get an update on the VR AS from Ananth, in addition to the update on the VR architecture from Paul. Thanks, Ross At 11:44 PM 4/13/2005 -0400, Ross Callon wrote: >At 05:35 PM 4/13/2005 -0400, W. Mark Townsley wrote: >>... >>>That is, I''m not sure if we are moving the A.S. along as an >>>Informational RFC or not. It''s a useful document, but I did not recall >>>what the WG decided to do with it. I know the main VR draft >>>(draft-ietf-l3vpn-vpn-vr) is on track, but not sure about the A.S. plan. >> >>Well, I inherited it from Thomas'' plate, so I suspect that the WG decided >>to advance it. Chairs, can you fill me in on the history a bit more, do >>we still want to advance the AS doc? >> >>Thanks, >> >>- Mark > >The current intention is to progress it. My recollection is that there was >working group consensus on this although there was a lot of indifference. >I think that there is some significant useful information in it. Looking >it over >again, most of it is in quite good shape (I only found a couple of places >where it seems to need update -- although I should take another look >tomorrow since it is a bit late to finish tonight). > >Unfortunately, there are a couple of places where it still needs to be updated >and/or fixed. For example: > > 13. Scalability > > PE-based PPVPNs have better scalability than CE-based PPVPNs, because > the total number of VPN tunnels that need to be managed are far > fewer in the > service provider backbone, than between CEs. > >There are of course many people who would disagree with this. With CE-based >VPNs, typically some "over IP" encapsulation is used (such as IPsec). There is >therefore essentially no state in the core of the network. It is hard to >scale better >than this (although there are other issues, such as the network management >effort, equipment cost, etc). > >Similarly, the beginning of the introduction says: > > 1. Introduction > > The virtual router concept for L3 PPVPNs was first introduced in > [COREVPN]. This was generalized in [PPVPNVR]. A number of > auto- discovery mechanisms can be used with this approach to L3 > PPVPNs, and [COREVPN] represents one such approach using IP > multicast. > >In fact, I heard about and worked on the virtual router concept before >[COREVPN] was published. I still remember my first impression when >I first saw a presentation on [COREVPN] -- I felt sorry for the presenter >(who I won''t name) because the approach was so obviously flawed (in >particular due to the way that it used IP Multicast). Thus I don''t think >that the introduction to this approach should start off with [COREVPN] >as the first thing to talk about. > >Nonetheless, in spite of a few nits such as this which I would personally >recommend to update, the AS contains a significant amount of useful >information (in my opinion). > >Ross > ' added by Mark Townsley |
2005-03-11
|
00 | Mark Townsley | Shepherding AD has been changed to Mark Townsley from Thomas Narten |
2004-11-24
|
00 | Thomas Narten | State Change Notice email list have been change to rick@rhwilder.net, rcallon@juniper.net, rbonica@juniper.net, jeremy.de_clercq@alcatel.be, dave.mcdysan@wcom.com, cliff.wang@us.army.mil from rick@rhwilder.net, rcallon@juniper.net, … State Change Notice email list have been change to rick@rhwilder.net, rcallon@juniper.net, rbonica@juniper.net, jeremy.de_clercq@alcatel.be, dave.mcdysan@wcom.com, cliff.wang@us.army.mil from rick@rhwilder.net, rcallon@juniper.net, ronald.p.bonica@mci.com, jeremy.de_clercq@alcatel.be, dave.mcdysan@wcom.com, cliff.wang@us.army.mil |
2004-08-25
|
00 | Thomas Narten | State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Thomas Narten |
2004-08-25
|
00 | Thomas Narten | State Change Notice email list have been change to rick@rhwilder.net, rcallon@juniper.net, ronald.p.bonica@mci.com, jeremy.de_clercq@alcatel.be, dave.mcdysan@wcom.com, cliff.wang@us.army.mil from , , |
2004-08-25
|
00 | Thomas Narten | [Note]: '2004-08-25: draft-ietf-l3vpn-ce-based-02.txt & draft-declercq-l3vpn-ce-based-as-00.txt go together. Need to better understand what wording/changes are needed to make clear that these documents are not a protocol … [Note]: '2004-08-25: draft-ietf-l3vpn-ce-based-02.txt & draft-declercq-l3vpn-ce-based-as-00.txt go together. Need to better understand what wording/changes are needed to make clear that these documents are not a protocol spec from which one can achieve interoperability. ' added by Thomas Narten |
2004-04-18
|
00 | Thomas Narten | Shepherding AD has been changed to Thomas Narten from Alex Zinin |
2004-04-12
|
00 | Michael Lee | State Change Notice email list have been change to , , from |
2004-04-12
|
00 | Barbara Fuller | Based on the request to publish this document as an "applicability statement," I have designated the "Intended Status" as "Informational RFC." I have requested confirmation … Based on the request to publish this document as an "applicability statement," I have designated the "Intended Status" as "Informational RFC." I have requested confirmation from Ross Callon. |
2004-04-12
|
00 | Barbara Fuller | Draft Added by Barbara Fuller |
2004-01-27
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-declercq-l3vpn-ce-based-as-00.txt |