%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-idr-reserved-extended-communities instead of this I-D.
@techreport{decraene-idr-reserved-extended-communities-00,
    number =    {draft-decraene-idr-reserved-extended-communities-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-decraene-idr-reserved-extended-communities/00/},
    author =    {Bruno Decraene and Pierre Francois},
    title =     {{Reserved BGP extended communities
}},
    pagetotal = 5,
    year =      2010,
    month =     oct,
    day =       18,
    abstract =  {This document assigns two BGP extended community types, one transitive and one non-transitive. It also defines two IANA registries in order to allow the allocation of reserved transitive and non-transitive extended communities. These are similar to the existing reserved (formerly Well-known) BGP communities defined in RFC 1997 but provides an easier control of inter-AS community advertissement as a community could be chosen as transitive or non- transitive across ASes.},
}