Extension to the Link Management Protocol (LMP/DWDM -rfc4209) for Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM) Optical Line Systems to manage application code of optical interface parameters in DWDM application
draft-dharinigert-ccamp-g-698-2-lmp-03
The information below is for an old version of the document.
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Expired".
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Dharini Hiremagalur , Gert Grammel , John Drake , Gabriele Galimberti , Zafar Ali , Ruediger Kunze | ||
| Last updated | 2013-07-15 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-dharinigert-ccamp-g-698-2-lmp-03
Internet Engineering Task Force D. Hiremagalur, Ed.
Internet-Draft G. Grammel, Ed.
Intended status: Standards Track J. Drake, Ed.
Expires: December 14, 2013 Juniper
G. Galimberti, Ed.
Z. Ali, Ed.
Cisco
R. Kunze, Ed.
Deutsche Telekom
July 15, 2013
Extension to the Link Management Protocol (LMP/DWDM -rfc4209) for Dense
Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM) Optical Line Systems to manage
application code of optical interface parameters in DWDM application
draft-dharinigert-ccamp-g-698-2-lmp-03
Abstract
This memo defines extensions to LMP(rfc4209) for managing Optical
parameters associated with Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM)
systems or characterized by the Optical Transport Network (OTN) in
accordance with the Interface Application Code approach defined in
ITU-T Recommendation G.698.2.[ITU.G698.2], G.694.1.[ITU.G694.1] and
its extendsions./>
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on December 14, 2013.
Hiremagalur, et al. Expires December 14, 2013 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft draft-dharinigert-ccamp-g-698-2-lmp-03 June 2013
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Extensions to LMP-WDM Protocol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Black Link General Parameters - BL_General . . . . . . . . . 4
4. Black Link ApplicationCode - BL_ApplicationCode . . . . . . . 4
5. Black Link - BL_Ss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
6. Black Link - BL_Rs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
8. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1. Introduction
This extension is based on "draft-galikunze-ccamp-g-698-2-snmp-
mib-03" and "draft-kunze-g-698-2-management-control-framework-02",
for the relevant interface optical parameters described in
recommendations like ITU-T G.698.2 [ITU.G698.2]. The LMP Model from
RFC4902 is extended to provide link property correlation between a
client and an OLS device. By using LMP, the capabilities of either
end of this link are exchanged where the term 'link' refers to the
attachment link between OXC and OLS (see Figure 1). By performing
link property correlation, both ends of the link can agree on a
common parameter window that can be supported and supervised by each
device. The actual selection of a specific parameter value whithin
the parameter window is outside the scope of LMP. In GMPLS the
parameter selection (e.g. wavelength) is performed by RSVP-TE and
Wavelength routing by IGP.
Hiremagalur, et al. Expires December 14, 2013 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft draft-dharinigert-ccamp-g-698-2-lmp-03 June 2013
Figure 1 Extended LMP Model ( from [RFC4209] )
+------+ Ss +------+ +------+ Rs +------+
| | ----- | | | | ----- | |
| OXC1 | ----- | OLS1 | ===== | OLS2 | ----- | OXC2 |
| | ----- | | | | ----- | |
+------+ +------+ +------+ +------+
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
| | | | | |
| +-----LMP-----+ +-----LMP-----+ |
| |
+----------------------LMP-----------------------+
OXC : is an entity that contains transponders
OLS : generic optical system, it can be -
Optical mux, Optical demux, Optical Add
Drop Mux, etc
OLS to OLS : represents the black-Link itself
Rs/Ss : inbetween the OXC and the OLS
Figure 1: Extended LMP Model
2. Extensions to LMP-WDM Protocol
This document defines extensions to [RFC4209] to allow the Black Link
(BL) parameters of G.698.2, as described in the draft draft-
kunze-g-698-2-management-control-framework-02, to be exchanged
between a router or optical switch and the optical line system to
which it is attached. In particular, this document defines
additional Data Link sub-objects to be carried in the LinkSummary
message defined in [RFC4204] and [RFC6205]. The OXC and OLS systems
may be managed by different Network management systems and hence may
not know the capability and status of their peer. The intent of this
draft is to enable the OXC and OLS systems to exchange this
information. These messages and their usage are defined in
subsequent sections of this document.
The following new messages are defined for the WDM extension for
ITU-T G.698.2 [ITU.G698.2]/ITU-T G.698.1 [ITU.G698.1]/
ITU-T G.959.1 [ITU.G959.1]
- BL_General (sub-object Type = TBA)
- BL_ApplicationCode (sub-object Type = TBA)
- BL_Ss (sub-object Type = TBA)
- BL_Rs (sub-object Type = TBA)
Hiremagalur, et al. Expires December 14, 2013 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft draft-dharinigert-ccamp-g-698-2-lmp-03 June 2013
3. Black Link General Parameters - BL_General
These are the general parameters as described in [G698.2] and
[G.694.1]. Please refer to the "draft-galikunze-ccamp-g-698-2-snmp-
mib-03" for more details about these parameters and the [RFC6205] for
the wavelength definition.
The general parameters are
1. Bit-Rate/line coding of optical tributary signals
2. Wavelength - (Tera Hertz) 4 bytes (see RFC6205 sec.3.2)
Figure 2: The format of the this sub-object (Type = TBA, Length =
TBA) is as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Length | (Reserved) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Bit-Rate/Line coding |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Wavelength |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 2: BL_General
4. Black Link ApplicationCode - BL_ApplicationCode
These are the general parameters as described in [G698.2]. Please
refer to the "draft-galikunze-ccamp-g-698-2-snmp-mib-03". for more
details about these parameters.
The general parameters are
1. Single-channel application codes -- 32 bytes
(from [G698.1]/[G698.2]/[G959.1]
Figure 3: The format of the this sub-object (Type = TBA, Length =
TBA) is as follows:
Hiremagalur, et al. Expires December 14, 2013 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft draft-dharinigert-ccamp-g-698-2-lmp-03 June 2013
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Length | (Reserved) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Single-channel Application Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
// .... //
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 3: BL_ApplicationCode
5. Black Link - BL_Ss
These are the G.698.2 parameters at the Source(Ss reference points).
Please refer to "draft-galikunze-ccamp-g-698-2-snmp-mib-03" for more
details about these parameters.
1. Minimum Mean Channel Output Power -(0.1 dbm) 4 bytes
2. Maximum Mean Channel Output Power -(0.1 dbm) 4 bytes
Figure 4: The format of the Black link sub-object (Type = TBA, Length
= TBA) is as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Length | (Reserved) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Minimum Mean Channel Output Power |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Maximum Mean Channel Output Power |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 4: Black Link - BL_Ss
6. Black Link - BL_Rs
These are the G.698.2 parameters at the Sink (Rs reference points).
Please refer to the "draft-galikunze-ccamp-g-698-2-snmp-mib-02" for
more details about these parameters.
Hiremagalur, et al. Expires December 14, 2013 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft draft-dharinigert-ccamp-g-698-2-lmp-03 June 2013
1. Minimum Mean Input Power - (0.1dbm) 4bytes
2. Maximum Mean Input Power - (0.1dbm) 4bytes
3. Minimum OSNR - (0.1dB) 4bytes
4. OSNR Tolerance - (0.1dB) 4bytes
5. Current Input Power - (0.1dbm) 4bytes
Figure 5: The format of the Black link sub-object (Type = TBA, Length
= TBA) is as follows:
The format of the Black Link/OLS Sink sub-object (Type = TBA,
Length = TBA) is as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Length | (Reserved) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Minimum Mean Input Power |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Maximum Mean Input Power |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Minimum OSNR |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| OSNR Tolerance |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Current Input Power |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 5: Black Link - BL_Rs
7. Security Considerations
LMP message security uses IPsec, as described in [RFC4204]. This
document only defines new LMP objects that are carried in existing
LMP messages, similar to the LMP objects in [RFC:4209]. This
document does not introduce new security considerations.
8. IANA Considerations
LMP <xref target="RFC4204"/> defines the following name spaces and
the ways in which IANA can make assignments to these namespaces:
- LMP Message Type
- LMP Object Class
- LMP Object Class type (C-Type) unique within the Object Class
- LMP Sub-object Class type (Type) unique within the Object Class
Hiremagalur, et al. Expires December 14, 2013 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft draft-dharinigert-ccamp-g-698-2-lmp-03 June 2013
This memo introduces the following new assignments:
LMP Sub-Object Class names:
under DATA_LINK Class name (as defined in <xref target="RFC4204"/>)
- BL_General (sub-object Type = TBA)
- BL_Applicationcode (sub-object Type = TBA)
- BL_Ss (sub-object Type = TBA)
- BL_Rs (sub-object Type = TBA)
9. References
9.1. Normative References
[RFC4204] Lang, J., "Link Management Protocol (LMP)", RFC 4204,
October 2005.
[RFC4209] Fredette, A. and J. Lang, "Link Management Protocol (LMP)
for Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM) Optical
Line Systems", RFC 4209, October 2005.
[RFC6205] Otani, T. and D. Li, "Generalized Labels for Lambda-
Switch-Capable (LSC) Label Switching Routers", RFC 6205,
March 2011.
[RFC4054] Strand, J. and A. Chiu, "Impairments and Other Constraints
on Optical Layer Routing", RFC 4054, May 2005.
[ITU.G698.2]
International Telecommunications Union, "Amplified
multichannel dense wavelength division multiplexing
applications with single channel optical interfaces ",
ITU-T Recommendation G.698.2, November 2009.
[ITU.G694.1]
International Telecommunications Union, ""Spectral grids
for WDM applications: DWDM frequency grid" ", ITU-T
Recommendation G.698.2, February 2012.
[ITU.G709]
International Telecommunications Union, "Interface for the
Optical Transport Network (OTN) ", ITU-T Recommendation
G.709, March 2003.
[ITU.G872]
Hiremagalur, et al. Expires December 14, 2013 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft draft-dharinigert-ccamp-g-698-2-lmp-03 June 2013
International Telecommunications Union, "Architecture of
optical transport networks ", ITU-T Recommendation G.872,
November 2001.
9.2. Informative References
[I-D.kunze-g-698-2-management-control-framework]
Kunze, R., "A framework for Management and Control of
optical interfaces supporting G.698.2", draft-
kunze-g-698-2-management-control-framework-00 (work in
progress), July 2011.
[I-D.galimbe-kunze-g-698-2-snmp-mib]
Kunze, R. and D. Hiremagalur, "A SNMP MIB to manage black-
link optical interface parameters of DWDM applications",
draft-galimbe-kunze-g-698-2-snmp-mib-02 (work in
progress), March 2012.
Authors' Addresses
Dharini Hiremagalur (editor)
Juniper
1194 N Mathilda Avenue
Sunnyvale - 94089 California
USA
Phone: +1408
Email: dharinih@juniper.net
Gert Grammel (editor)
Juniper
1194 N Mathilda Avenue
Sunnyvale - 94089 California
USA
Phone: +1408
Email: ggrammel@juniper.net
John E. Drake (editor)
Juniper
1194 N Mathilda Avenue
HW-US,Pennsylvania
USA
Phone: +1408
Email: jdrake@juniper.net
Hiremagalur, et al. Expires December 14, 2013 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft draft-dharinigert-ccamp-g-698-2-lmp-03 June 2013
Gabriele Galimberti (editor)
Cisco
Via Philips,12
20052 - Monza
Italy
Phone: +390392091462
Email: ggalimbe@cisco.com
Zafar Ali (editor)
Cisco
3000 Innovation Drive
KANATA
ONTARIO K2K 3E8
Email: zali@cisco.com
Ruediger Kunze (editor)
Deutsche Telekom
Dddd, xx
Berlin
Germany
Phone: +49xxxxxxxxxx
Email: RKunze@telekom.de
Hiremagalur, et al. Expires December 14, 2013 [Page 9]