%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects instead of this I-D.
@techreport{dhody-ccamp-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects-00,
    number =    {draft-dhody-ccamp-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-ccamp-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects/00/},
    author =    {Dhruv Dhody and Udayasree Palle and Venugopal Reddy Kondreddy and Ramon Casellas},
    title =     {{Domain Subobjects for Resource ReserVation Protocol - Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE)}},
    pagetotal = 13,
    year =      2012,
    month =     oct,
    day =       3,
    abstract =  {The RSVP-TE specification, {[}RFC3209{]} and GMPLS extensions to RSVP-TE, {[}RFC3473{]} allow abstract nodes and resources to be explicitly included in a path setup. Further Exclude Routes Extension {[}RFC4874{]} allow abstract nodes and resources to be explicitly excluded in a path setup. The use of Autonomous Number (AS) (2-Byte) as an abstract node representing domain is already defined in {[}RFC3209{]} and {[}RFC4874{]}. This document specifies new subobjects to include or exclude domains during path setup where domain is a collection of network elements within a common sphere of address management or path computational responsibility such as an IGP area or an Autonomous Systems (4-Byte).},
}