Domain Subobjects for Resource ReserVation Protocol - Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE)
draft-dhody-ccamp-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects-02
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(ccamp WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Dhruv Dhody , Udayasree Palle , Venugopal Reddy Kondreddy , Ramon Casellas | ||
| Last updated | 2013-10-04 (Latest revision 2013-07-09) | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
The Resource ReserVation Protocol - Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) specification [RFC3209] and the Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) extensions to RSVP-TE [RFC3473] allow abstract nodes and resources to be explicitly included in a path setup. Further Exclude Routes extensions [RFC4874] allow abstract nodes and resources to be explicitly excluded in a path setup. This document specifies new subobjects to include or exclude domains during path setup where domain is a collection of network elements within a common sphere of address management or path computational responsibility (such as an Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) area or an Autonomous System (AS)). Note that the use of AS as an abstract node representing domain is already defined in [RFC3209] and [RFC4874], albeit with a 2-Byte AS number.
Authors
Dhruv Dhody
Udayasree Palle
Venugopal Reddy Kondreddy
Ramon Casellas
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)