%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor instead of this I-D. @techreport{dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-16, number = {draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-16}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor/16/}, author = {Cheng Li and Haomian Zheng and Siva Sivabalan and Samuel Sidor and Zafar Ali}, title = {{Conveying Vendor-Specific Information in the Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP) extensions for Stateful PCE.}}, pagetotal = 12, year = 2023, month = jan, day = 11, abstract = {A Stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) maintains information on the current network state, including computed Label Switched Path (LSPs), reserved resources within the network, and the pending path computation requests. This information may then be considered when computing new traffic engineered LSPs, and for the associated and the dependent LSPs, received from a Path Computation Client (PCC). RFC 7470 defines a facility to carry vendor-specific information in Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP). This document extends this capability for the Stateful PCEP messages.}, }