%% You should probably cite draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls-27 instead of this revision.
@techreport{dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls-20,
    number =    {draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls-20},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls/20/},
    author =    {Dhruv Dhody and Shuping Peng and Young Lee and Daniele Ceccarelli and Aijun Wang and Gyan Mishra},
    title =     {{PCEP extensions for Distribution of Link-State and TE Information}},
    pagetotal = 39,
    year =      ,
    month =     ,
    day =       ,
    abstract =  {In order to compute and provide optimal paths, a Path Computation Elements (PCEs) require an accurate and timely Traffic Engineering Database (TED). Traditionally, this TED has been obtained from a link state (LS) routing protocol supporting the traffic engineering extensions. This document extends the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) with Link-State and TE Information as an experimental extension.},
}