%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-pce-pcep-ls instead of this I-D. @techreport{dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls-26, number = {draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls-26}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls/26/}, author = {Dhruv Dhody and Shuping Peng and Young Lee and Daniele Ceccarelli and Aijun Wang}, title = {{PCEP extensions for Distribution of Link-State and TE Information}}, pagetotal = 39, year = , month = , day = , abstract = {In order to compute and provide optimal paths, a Path Computation Elements (PCEs) require an accurate and timely Traffic Engineering Database (TED). Traditionally, this TED has been obtained from a link state (LS) routing protocol supporting the traffic engineering extensions. This document extends the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) with Link-State and TE Information as an experimental extension.}, }