An IPv4 Flowlabel Option
draft-dreibholz-ipv4-flowlabel-26
|
| Document |
Type |
|
Active Internet-Draft (individual)
|
|
Last updated |
|
2017-08-06
|
|
Stream |
|
(None)
|
|
Intended RFC status |
|
(None)
|
|
Formats |
|
plain text
pdf
html
bibtex
|
| Stream |
Stream state |
|
(No stream defined) |
|
Consensus Boilerplate |
|
Unknown
|
|
RFC Editor Note |
|
(None)
|
| IESG |
IESG state |
|
I-D Exists
|
|
Telechat date |
|
|
|
Responsible AD |
|
(None)
|
|
Send notices to |
|
(None)
|
Network Working Group T. Dreibholz
Internet-Draft Simula Research Laboratory
Intended status: Standards Track August 06, 2017
Expires: February 7, 2018
An IPv4 Flowlabel Option
draft-dreibholz-ipv4-flowlabel-26.txt
Abstract
This draft defines an IPv4 option containing a flowlabel that is
compatible to IPv6. It is required for simplified usage of IntServ
and interoperability with IPv6.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on February 7, 2018.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Dreibholz Expires February 7, 2018 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft An IPv4 Flowlabel Option August 2017
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.2. Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.3. Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. A Flow Label Option for IPv4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1. Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1.1. The Flow Label Field of IPv6 . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1.2. The Limitations of IntServ via IPv4 . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2. Definition of the Flow Label Option . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3. Translation between IPv6 and IPv4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
6. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
7. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
7.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1. Introduction
1.1. Terminology
This document uses the following terms:
o IntServ (Integrated Services): Reservation of network resources
(bandwidth) on a per-flow basis. See [RFC1633], [RFC2205],
[RFC2208], [RFC2209], [RFC2210], [RFC2211] and [RFC2212] for
details.
o Flow: An IntServ reservation between two endpoints.
o Flow Label: The Flow Label field of the IPv6 header and the IPv4
option header defined in this draft. It is used for marking a
packet to use a specific IntServ reservation. See [RFC6437],
[RFC6436] for detailed descriptions.
1.2. Abbreviations
o RSVP: ReSource Reservation Protocol
o SCTP: Stream Control Transmission Protocol
o TCP: Transmission Control Protocol
o QoS: Quality of Service
Dreibholz Expires February 7, 2018 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft An IPv4 Flowlabel Option August 2017
o UDP: User Datagram Protocol
1.3. Conventions
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
2. A Flow Label Option for IPv4
Show full document text