DetNet Data Plane Encapsulation
draft-dt-detnet-dp-sol-02
| Document | Type | Replaced Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Jouni Korhonen , Loa Andersson , Yuanlong Jiang , Norman Finn , Balazs Varga , János Farkas , Carlos Bernardos , Tal Mizrahi , Lou Berger | ||
| Last updated | 2017-09-07 | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-detnet-dp-sol | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized (tools)
htmlized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-detnet-dp-sol | |
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-dt-detnet-dp-sol-02.txt
Abstract
This document specifies Deterministic Networking data plane encapsulation solutions. The described data plane solutions can be applied over either IP or MPLS Packet Switched Networks. Comment #1: SB> An overarching comment is that the early part of the document is really fundamental architecture and perhaps belongs in the arch draft, leaving this draft to be more specific about solutions. Indeed if we cannot find a single solution that maps to both IP and MPLS underlays I wonder if we should publish two specialist RFCs? Discussion: One document at the beginning, split into two if/when needed. Would be post adoption in any case. Comment #2: SB> Whilst I think we should look for a common solution to IP and MPLS I do not think that this is where the DT ended up. Discussion: Agree.
Authors
Jouni Korhonen
(jouni.nospam@gmail.com)
Loa Andersson
(loa@pi.nu)
Yuanlong Jiang
(jiangyuanlong@huawei.com)
Norman Finn
(norman.finn@mail01.huawei.com)
Balazs Varga
(balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com)
János Farkas
(janos.farkas@ericsson.com)
Carlos Bernardos
(cjbc@it.uc3m.es)
Tal Mizrahi
(talmi@marvell.com)
Lou Berger
(lberger@labn.net)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)