ANIMA Intent Policy and Format
draft-du-anima-an-intent-05
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Zongpeng Du , Sheng Jiang , Jéferson Campos Nobre , Laurent Ciavaglia , Michael H. Behringer | ||
| Last updated | 2017-08-18 (Latest revision 2017-02-14) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
One of the goals of autonomic networking is to simplify the management of networks by human operators. Intent Based Networking (IBN) is a possible approach to realize this goal. With IBN, the operator indicates to the network what to do (i.e. her intent) and not how to do it. In the field of Policy Based Management (PBM), the concept of intent is called a declarative policy. This document proposes a refinement of the intent concept initially defined in [RFC7575] for autonomic networks by providing a more complete definition, a life-cycle, some use cases and a tentative format of the ANIMA Intent Policy.
Authors
Zongpeng Du
Sheng Jiang
Jéferson Campos Nobre
Laurent Ciavaglia
Michael H. Behringer
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)