%% You should probably cite rfc6247 instead of this I-D. @techreport{eggert-tcpm-historicize-02, number = {draft-eggert-tcpm-historicize-02}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eggert-tcpm-historicize/02/}, author = {Lars Eggert}, title = {{Moving the Undeployed TCP Extensions RFC 1072, RFC 1106, RFC 1110, RFC 1145, RFC 1146, RFC 1379, RFC 1644, and RFC 1693 to Historic Status}}, pagetotal = 4, year = 2011, month = mar, day = 15, abstract = {This document reclassifies several TCP extensions that have never seen widespread use to Historic status. The affected RFCs are RFC 1072, RFC 1106, RFC 1110, RFC 1145, RFC 1146, RFC 1379, RFC 1644, and RFC 1693. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.}, }