IPPM Considerations for the IPv6 PDM Destination Option
draft-elkins-ippm-pdm-option-03
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Nalini Elkins , Rob Hamilton , Michael Ackermann | ||
| Last updated | 2015-08-19 (Latest revision 2015-02-15) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
To assess performance problems, measurements based on optional sequence numbers and timing may be embedded in each packet. Such measurements may be interpreted in real-time or after the fact. An implementation of the existing IPv6 Destination Options extension header, the Performance and Diagnostic Metrics (PDM) Destination Options extension header has been proposed in a companion document. This document specifies the field limits, calculations, and usage of the PDM in measurement.
Authors
Nalini Elkins
Rob Hamilton
Michael Ackermann
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)