ICE Updated Offer Problematic
draft-elwell-mmusic-ice-updated-offer-02
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | John Elwell , Andrew Hutton , Thomas Stach | ||
| Last updated | 2012-06-14 (Latest revision 2011-12-12) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) requires an updated offer-answer cycle under some circumstances, to satisfy the needs of some devices on the signalling path. When used with SIP, this additional offer-answer cycle interacts with other things, such as fax and third party call control (3PCC). This document describes the problems and discusses possible remedies. This work is being discussed on the mmusic@ietf.org mailing list.
Authors
John Elwell
Andrew Hutton
Thomas Stach
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)