Fast Reroute for Node Protection in LDP-based LSPs
draft-esale-mpls-ldp-node-frr-05
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Santosh Esale , Raveendra Torvi , Luyuan Fang , Luay Jalil | ||
| Last updated | 2017-09-14 (Latest revision 2017-03-13) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document describes procedures to support node protection for unicast Label Switched Paths (LSPs) established by Label Distribution Protocol (LDP). In order to protect a node N, the Point of Local Repair (PLR) of N must discover the Merge Points (MPs) of node N such that traffic can be redirected to them in case of node N failure. Redirecting the traffic around the failed node N depends on existing point-to-point LSPs originated from the PLR to the MPs while bypassing the protected node N. The procedures described in this document are topology independent in a sense that they provide node protection in any topology so long as there is a alternate path in the network that avoids the protected node.
Authors
Santosh Esale
Raveendra Torvi
Luyuan Fang
Luay Jalil
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)