%% You should probably cite rfc6452 instead of this I-D. @techreport{faltstrom-5892bis-05, number = {draft-faltstrom-5892bis-05}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-faltstrom-5892bis/05/}, author = {Patrik Fältström and Paul E. Hoffman}, title = {{The Unicode Code Points and Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA) - Unicode 6.0}}, pagetotal = 4, year = 2011, month = jun, day = 9, abstract = {This memo documents IETF consensus for Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA) derived character properties related to the three code points, existing in Unicode 5.2, that changed property values when version 6.0 was released. The consensus is that no update is needed to RFC 5892 based on the changes made in Unicode 6.0. {[}STANDARDS-TRACK{]}}, }