Inter-network Coexistence in the Internet of Things
draft-feeney-t2trg-inter-network-02

The information below is for an old version of the document
Document Type Active Internet-Draft (individual)
Last updated 2018-05-02
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats pdf htmlized bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
Network Working Group                                          L. Feeney
Internet-Draft                                        Uppsala University
Intended status: Informational                                  V. Fodor
Expires: November 3, 2018                                            KTH
                                                            May 02, 2018

          Inter-network Coexistence in the Internet of Things
                  draft-feeney-t2trg-inter-network-02

Abstract

   The breadth of IoT applications implies that there will be many
   diverse, administratively independent networks operating in the same
   physical location.  In many cases, these networks will use unlicensed
   spectrum, due to its low cost and ease of deployment.  However, this
   spectrum is becoming increasingly crowded.  IoT networks will
   therefore be subject to wireless interference, both from similar
   networks and from networks that use the wireless channel in very
   different ways.

   High-density, heterogeneous wireless environments present formidable
   challenges for network coexistence.  The PHY and MAC layers are
   primarily responsible for defining how radios use the channel.  But
   higher layer protocols are also a party to adverse interactions
   between networks.  To date, there have been few performance studies
   that fully reflect this aspect of the future IoT operating
   environment, particularly with respect to protocol behavior and
   network-scale interactions.

   This document describes key challenges for coexistence and highlights
   some recent research results showing the impact of protocol level
   interactions on network performance.  It identifies two opportunities
   for the IRTF T2TRG community.  The first is to define best practices
   for performance evaluation and protocol design in the context of
   network coexistence.  The second is to investigate the use of higher
   layer protocols to actively participate in managing network
   coexistence.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Feeney & Fodor          Expires November 3, 2018                [Page 1]
Internet-Draft          inter-network coexistence               May 2018

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on November 3, 2018.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   2.  IoT interaction challenges  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     2.1.  Scale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     2.2.  Independence  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     2.3.  Resource limitations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     2.4.  Diversity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
       2.4.1.  Radio and PHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
       2.4.2.  Network structures  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
       2.4.3.  Protocols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
   3.  Interaction behaviors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
     3.1.  WiFi  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
     3.2.  IEEE 802.15.4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
     3.3.  MAC layer interactions  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
   4.  Network coexistence in the IRTF/IETF context  . . . . . . . .  10
     4.1.  Protocol evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
     4.2.  Adaptive mitigation strategies  . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
     4.3.  Active mitigation strategies  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  12
     4.4.  Role of Spectrum Regulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
   5.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  14
   6.  Conclusion  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  15
Show full document text