Skip to main content

RFC 1264 Is Obsolete
draft-fenner-obsolete-1264-03

Yes

(Jon Peterson)
(Mark Townsley)
(Ross Callon)
(Russ Housley)
(Sam Hartman)

No Objection

(Jari Arkko)
(Lars Eggert)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Ted Hardie)

Recuse

(Bill Fenner)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.

Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (2006-08-31) Unknown
Strong support, but the first point in Dan's Discuss needs fixing.
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (2006-08-30) Unknown
As a random note for other ADs... I was concerned about if there was consensus for this since there seemed to be no WGLC comments but reading the lists - I would say there was very strong consensus for this.
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Ross Callon Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2006-10-26) Unknown
The new text in version 3 added a reference to draft-farrel-rtg-manageability-requirements-01. This draft is expired, and there is no direct continuation going on. Although I fully sympathize with the intention and support turning draft-farrel-rtg-manageability-requirements into a more permanent reference for manageability requirement I belive that at this phase the reference to this document should bebetter dropped.
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2006-08-31) Unknown
One side of me says that it good to obsolete a document that was too rigid in practise. However, another side makes me sad that we take a step away from requiring running code. Personally, I believe we should
require running code more often for all IETF produced protocols. Basically, running code should be the norm and we can grant exceptions when sensible. However, this is really an IETF wide issue and this particular document is not the right time & place to have that discussion.
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
Recuse
Recuse () Unknown