%% You should probably cite draft-fizgeer-pce-pcep-bfd-parameters-02 instead of this revision.
@techreport{fizgeer-pce-pcep-bfd-parameters-00,
    number =    {draft-fizgeer-pce-pcep-bfd-parameters-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fizgeer-pce-pcep-bfd-parameters/00/},
    author =    {Orly Bachar and Marina Fizgeer},
    title =     {{PCEP Extensions to support BFD parameters}},
    pagetotal = 10,
    year =      2022,
    month =     dec,
    day =       20,
    abstract =  {This document proposes extension to PCEP to configure LSP parameters. Some of LSP parameters are needed to configure S-BFD for candidate paths. Each candidate path is identified in PCEP by its uniquely assigned PLSP-ID. The mechanism proposed in this document is applicable to to all path setup types. The need for these definitions first appeared for Segment Routing path setup type, both MPLS and IPv6 data planes of SR.},
}